Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01274-04
Original file (01274-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
                                    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
 BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
 2 NAVY ANNEX
 WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100       
        
         MEH:ddj
 Docket No: 1274-04
 20 April 2004
From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy
         Subj

         Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
End:     (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
 (2)      NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 4811/151 of 1 April 2004
(3)      Subject’s naval record
1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the MA rating.
2.       The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 April 2004 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3.       The Board having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.




Docket No: 1274-04
RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

 a.       The 3 month NAVPERS 1070/62 1 extension agreement that was executed on
 28 August 2003 became operative on 6 September 2003, establishing a SEAOS of
 5 December 2003, and the 24 month NAVPERS 1070/62 1 that was also executed on
28 August 2003 is changed to reflect the OTT option and will not be used in SRB
computations.

 b.       He was discharged on 26 October 2003 and reenlisted on 27 October 2003 (completion of MA “A” school). The term is 6 years.
c.       The above changes will entitle petitioner to a zone “A” SRB, award level 1.5, for the MA rating.
d.       That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4.       Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        G. L. ADAMS
Recorder         Acting Recorder

 5.       Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.


 20 April 2004

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 00660-04

    Original file (00660-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The 3 year reenlistment executed on or about 15 January 2004 is null and void. In accordance with reference (a), the Board for Correction of Naval Records has reviewed allegations of error and injustice in the naval record of the subject. Copy to: DFAS w/o enclosures CNP w/o enclosures

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01314-04

    Original file (01314-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: AM3 USN, REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD L. ADAMSHead, Pay Section Copy to: DFAS w/o enclosures CNP w/o enclosures DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 13 14-04 12 May 2004 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Chief of Naval Personnel In accordance with reference (a), the Board for Correction of Naval Records has...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04052-04

    Original file (04052-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the IT rating(NEC 2735). The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. Nicholson, and Ms. Gilbert reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 July 2004 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01635-07

    Original file (01635-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” and “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. 1635-07RECOMMENDATION:That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: The 4 year reenlistment executed on or about 14 November 2003 is null and void.b.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05641-05

    Original file (05641-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    5641-05 20 September 2005From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the MA rating.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04235-04

    Original file (04235-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. Nicholson, and Ms. Gilbert reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 July 2004 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the avialable evidence of record. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10694-02

    Original file (10694-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, flied enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the AT rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10674-02

    Original file (10674-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B t Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the AT rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03383-03

    Original file (03383-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: The 6 year reenlistment executed on or about 19 October 2001 is null and void. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05599-03

    Original file (05599-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr. McPartlin, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 August 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,...