Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06615-03
Original file (06615-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTIONOF NAVALRECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

TRG
Docket No: 6615-03
30 October 2003

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
(1) Case Summary
(2) Subject's naval record

From:
To:
Subj:

Ref:
Encl:

Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
1.
former enlisted member in the Navy,
filed an application with
this Board requesting that his record be corrected by upgrading
the general discharge he received on 3 November 1946.
2.

The Board, consisting of Mr.
Mr.
of
reviewed Petitioner's a
tober 2003 and, pursuant to its regula

be taken on the
Documentary material considered by

that the corrective action indicated below should 
available evidence of record.
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3.
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:
a.

The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining

Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

Although it appears that Petitioner's application was

not filed in a timely manner,
waive the statute of limitations and review the application on
its merits.

it is in the interest of justice to

Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 28 November 1940 at
He then served without incident until 13 January 1942,

C .
age 17.
when he received nonjudicial punishment for wasting food, using
profane language and lying.
Later in 1942, he graduated from the
Submarine Training School and he subsequently participated in
several war patrols aboard the USS GROWLER (SS 215).

In August 1945,

Petitioner was charged with being

d.

disrespectful to a superior officer and striking him. A general
court-martial convened on 31 August 1945 and convicted Petitioner
of only the disrespect offense.

The court sentenced him to

dishonorable.discharge.

reduction to apprentice seaman, confinement at hard labor for
three years and a 
authority mitigated the sentence to confinement at hard labor for
six months and a bad conduct discharge, and the discharge was
suspended on 12 months probation.
confinement on 9 March 1946.
He then served without incident
until he was issued a general discharge on 3 November 1946.

He was restored to duty from

The convening

e.

Petitioner's case was reviewed by the Board of Review,

(BRDD) in 1947.
Discharges and Dismissals  
of disrespect the BRDD states as follows:

Concerning the charge

. 

. While on liberty, and in a public cafe, the

. 
petitioner approached the table of the officer . . .
LCDR, and his wife, and addressed himself to the
officer's wife on the basis that they had met before.
Although the lady denied ever having seen him before
and after the officer had asked him to leave and avoid
any trouble, the petitioner persisted in his advances
saying "We're not aboard ship now.
Your rate does not
mean a damn thing now",
outside.
the Shore Patrol and the Shore Patrol had actually
arrived that petitioner left the table. . . .
f.

lft was not until after the officer had called

and invited the officer

Petitioner states in his application, in effect, that
this was a minor offense and the court ignored his good record,
which included about three years in the war zone.
incident which led to his court-martial,
a bar celebrating the victory over Japan, the woman involved was
not the officer's wife and, in effect,
blown completely out of proportion.
He further states that he
has been very active in the Los Angeles chapter of the U. S.
Submarine Veterans of World War II and has published a chapter
newsletter for 20 years at his own expense.
He has submitted
newspaper clippings concerning the memorial he built in his back
yard to honor the submariners killed during World War II.

Concerning the
he states that he was in

that the incident was

ST.

Regulations in effect at the time precluded the issuance

of a fully honorable discharge to any Sailor convicted by a
general court-martial.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.
The Board believes that Petitioner's lengthy period of
good wartime service, the nature of the offense that led to the
general court-martial conviction,
and his post war participation
in a World War II veterans group are mitigating factors.
Since

2

Therefore, the Board

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 3

the individuals involved may have been intoxicated, it appears
that the sentence imposed was very severe.
concludes that no useful purpose is served by the general
discharge and it should now be recharacterized to honorable.
RECOMMENDATION:
a.
November 1946 he was issued an honorable discharge vice the
general discharge now of record.
b.
naval record.
4.
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's

That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's

ALAN E. GOLDSMITH
Acting Recorder

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
5.
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
723.6(e))
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a),
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

has been approved by the Board on

3



Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2009-096

    Original file (2009-096.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. While his military record contains many medical records, there is no record of any injury aboard a ship or of any hospitali- zation for such an injury. of the current Personnel Manual, it is possible that a member today who had, like the applicant, been AOL for more than nine months after previously having been AWOL for about four months,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05252-01

    Original file (05252-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was 2 On 14 September 1945 the convening That board concluded that in spite of his favorable sentenced to confinement for 33 months, total forfeitures, and a bad conduct discharge. While the Board does not condone such misconduct during a period of wartime, the Board notes that his service in combat appears to have been exemplary. country and the Board believes the sentence to a bad conduct discharge, even if appropriate at the time, should now be recharacterized as a matter of clemency.

  • CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2008-204

    Original file (2008-204.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated October 22, 2009, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant1 asked the Board to correct his military record to show that he was awarded a Purple Heart for an injury he received when his ship, the USS CAVALIER, was torpedoed by a Japanese submarine on January 30, 1945. 2007-032, in which the Board ordered the Coast Guard to review the applicant’s record to determine whether he was entitled to a Purple Heart Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089881C070403

    Original file (2003089881C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was wounded in December 1944 and January 1945 when the Japanese Prisoner of War (POW) ships Oryoku Maru and Enoura Maru were sunk by United States planes. Accordingly, the Board finds that the applicant was entitled to be awarded two awards of the Purple Heart for wounds sustained as a result of enemy action on 15 December 1944 and 9 January 1945, while serving in the rank of 1LT and in a POW status. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of...

  • CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2009-152

    Original file (2009-152.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    of the current Medals and Awards Manual, to receive a Purple Heart, a member must incur a wound that is a direct result of any enemy action and that “required treatment by a medical authority (except in the case of a prisoner of war).” PSC stated that “there is no record of the applicant having been treated by medical authorities for combat related injuries due to an incident resulting from shrapnel or any such combat-related malady. Purple Heart Medals are awarded to members wounded as a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00552-02

    Original file (00552-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the bad conduct discharge issued on 11 April 1946. f. On 25 July 1945 the convening authority approved only so much of the sentence that call for a bad conduct discharge (BCD), confinement for five months and forfeitures of $20 for six months. The suspended bad...

  • CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2012-125

    Original file (2012-125.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Naval Hospital, St. Albans, New York, from 27 March 45 to 17 April 45 for psychiatric rehabilitation.” The doctors reported that he remained depressed, was unfit for duty, and should be medically discharged because “treatment under conditions of service will be difficult due to slow development of hos- tility.” They noted that he had “been informed of the Board’s findings and does not desire to submit a statement in rebuttal.” On May 9, 1945, the Commander of the 3rd Naval District issued...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01130-03

    Original file (01130-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 11 September 1946, the commanding officer informed the Bureau of Naval Personnel of the civil conviction, but recommended that Petitioner be retained in the Navy. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 15 November 1946 he was issued a general discharge by reason of misconduct vice the undesirable discharge now of record. 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010313

    Original file (20080010313.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the FSM was a prisoner of war for two and a half years during his service in the Asiatic-Pacific Theater, therefore, he is entitled to award of the POW Medal and correction of his records to show this award. The evidence of record shows the FSM was awarded the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the FSM the Purple Heart for wounds...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02047-01

    Original file (02047-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Subject,enlisted in the Naval Reserve Force on 4 October On 8 January 1918 he was discharged from that component to 1917. enlist in the Regular manner for about 10 by a summary hours. The At that time he was record shows that he left: the United States on 13 January 1944. b. naval record.