Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05038-03
Original file (05038-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

BJG
Docket No: 5038-03
5 September 2003

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 5 September 2003. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated
15 July 2003, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Executive Dir
I----v

Enclosure

‘

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

3280  RUSSELL ROA

D

QUANTICO, VIRGINIA

 

22134-5  

t 

03

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

RESE
MAJO

BCNR APPLICATION ICO

A  thorough review has been conducted 

1.
request to have his period of inactivity
designated ‘Inactive Status List"
failures of selection to Lieutenant Colonel.
that both requests be denied.
provided.

o

  (May 97  

- 

Ott 99)

and the removal of his three

It is recommended

The below justification is

a.

In compliance with  

MC0 

PlOOlR.lJ  (Marine Corps Reserve

Administration Management Manual) when a Marine is assigned to the
(ISL) they will not be allowed to participate
Inactive Status List  
in Reserve training or earn Reserve retirement points.
impractical to assign Major
already participated and ea
requested period.
unsatisfactory years and one satisfactory year for retirement
during the request period.
he was in fact able to drill.
correspondence courses to take which, would have allowed him to
earn enough points to achieve satisfactory years as well as
enhance his promotion opportunities by working on Professional
Military Education requirements for his grade.

The one satisfactory year shows that
He also had available Marine Corps

to the ISL after he has
rement points for the

was credited with two

Major

It is

b.

A review of the SMCR  

revealed the following:

LtCol Promotion Board Reports
- SNM was in the Below Zone
- SNM was In Zone
& FY04 

- SNM was in the Above Zone

FYOl 
FY02 
FY03 

quest he failed to be selected on

For all o

As indicated by Major
all boards.
Submitted Materials report he never submitted anything to any of
the boards.
proactive intent on behalf Maj
in the Marine Administrative Messages which announce promotion
board dates and the zones for each board that Marines submit a
letter to the President of their promotion boards to explain any

In our view this demonstrates a sincere lack of

boards according to the

It is highly recommend

Subi: RESERVE 
.,,_._____.

---

AFFAk,_.S ADVISORY OPINION ON
._
-,.

--- 

BcNk A P PLI CATION 

Ice

explain any unusual circumstances as well
photograph and other material as stated in the message.

as submit a current

3.

Point of contact

is



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08299-01

    Original file (08299-01.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BJG Docket No: 8299-01 13 February 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was not...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03797-02

    Original file (03797-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 31 May 2002, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02697-01

    Original file (02697-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former warrant officer in the Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 1 January 2001 but he requests removal of a failure of selection to CW04 and missed pay and/or retirement points from 19 December 2000 to the present. The advisory opinion points out that if the corrected request...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01682-10

    Original file (01682-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a commissioned officer of the United States Marine Corps Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the last four of his six unsatisfactory reserve retirement anniversary years be removed and that he be placed on the Inactive Status List (ISL) effective 12 August 2005 in accordance with reference (b) . He did not participate again until 12 August 2009. In his case, this should have occurred on 12 August...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05817-03

    Original file (05817-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows: He was considered by the mobilization disposition board convened in August 1995, which resulted in his transfer to the ISL on 1 September 1995. d. Relying on title 10, United States Code, section 12642, Petitioner contends that his failures of selection to commander should be removed (and by implication, his consequent discharge should be set aside), because...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2003-036

    Original file (2003-036.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated October 30, 2003, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST The applicant, now serving as a lieutenant in the Reserve, asked the Board to correct his record to show that he earned at least 50 points in his anniversary years ending in 1997 and 1998, so that each anniversary year would count as a satisfactory year of federal service for retirement purposes.1 He alleged that because the Coast Guard erroneously recorded his participation as...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08391-07

    Original file (08391-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion from the Headquarters Marine Corps Career Management Team, dated 23 October 2007 with enclosures, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive DirectorEnclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYHEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Jan 31 11_19_45 CST 2001

    i DSN Copy to: 21, 40) By direction o 703 614 9857.~2/ 2 .,~ 1920 PERS-911 ~7 JUN )999 SENT BY : IJSAED-CELMS-ED 7- 7-93 ;10:45AM COftS OF ENGINEERS— DEPARTMENT OF TH1 NAVY NAVY PISIONNIL COMMAND 17*0 ENTIOIITY DRIVI MILUNCTON TN 31055-0000 Comrnanc Personnel C From: To: Via: Subj: YOUR STATUS IN THE NAVAL RESERVE Ref: (a) SECNAVINST 1920.6A (b) COMNAVRESFORINST 1740.1 Per reference (a), an officer in the permanent grade of 1. lieutenant who has twice failed of selection for promotion to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02507-01

    Original file (02507-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested, in effect, removal of your failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 99 and 00 Naval Reserve Line Lieutenant Commander Selection Boards; that you be granted a special selection board for FY 99; that your discharge of 31 March 2000 from the Naval Reserve be set aside; that you be reinstated to the Inactive Status List lieutenant, with a date of rank adjustment to reflect seniority as if you had been placed on the ISL on 1 June 1998; and that your 16 June 1995 completion of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05507-03

    Original file (05507-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2003. The Board noted that there are many individuals in the reserve component that have missed qualifying years by a few points who have had to serve additionai years in order to qualify for Since you can remain a member of the Marine Corps retirement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...