Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03567-03
Original file (03567-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X

2 NAVY ANNE

S

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JRF
Docket No: 3567-03
10 September 2003

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

FORMER
REVJEW

10 U.S.C. 1552

DD Form 149
Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to
show that he was assigned a more favorable reentry code.

2. The Board, consisting of Mses.
Petitioner’s allegations of error and
regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

shouid be taken on the

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations
of error and injustice finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.

c. Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps on 30 August 1999, and served until 8

February 2000, when he was discharged by reason of a condition, not a disability, which
interfered with his performance of duty, to wit, diabetes mellitus. He was assigned a
reenlistment code of RE-4. There is no entry in his Administrative Remarks page concerning
the assignment of a reentry code, his Offenses and Punishments page is blank and there is no
indication elsewhere in his record that he committed any acts of misconduct during his
enlistment, or that his performance of duty, apart from his medical condition, was
unsatisfactory.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that in view
of the lack of an administrative remarks entry justifying the assignment of an RE-4 reentry
code, and the absence of a record of disciplinary action or poor performance, it would be in
the interest of justice to assign Petitioner a reentry code of 
RE-3P, vice the code of RE-4 he
was actually assigned at discharge.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected

code of RE-3P on 8 February 2000, in place of the
date.

to show that he was assigned a reentry
RE-4 code he actually received on that

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner

’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of
the Board for correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing
corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board
on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03136-01

    Original file (03136-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board show that he was assigned a reenlistment (RE) code received on 19 May 2000. retquesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to more favorable than the RE-4 he 2. That Petitioner ’s naval recolrd be corrected to show that on 19 May 2000, he was discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment, and assigned a reenlistment code of RE-3P in lieu of the code of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02456-01

    Original file (02456-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected to show that on 8 December 2000, was discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment, and assigned a reenlistment code of 3P in lieu of the code of RE-4 actually assigned on ,that date. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR408 14

    Original file (NR408 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code, issued on 7 March 2013, be changed. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Boyd, and Ms. Countryman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 June 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05274-99

    Original file (05274-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that he was not discharged because of osteoporosis, and that his reenlistment code be changed. In the opinion of the orthopedic specialist who evaluated Petitioner, it was unclear whether the latter condition existed prior to Petitioner ’s enlistment, or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2971 14

    Original file (NR2971 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    >, The Board, consisting of Mr. Hedrick, Mr. Sproul and Ms. Polk, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Subsequently, the BOI recommended that he be separated with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge. The Board concludes that relief in the form of his assigned RE-3P reentry code be changed to read...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01088-01

    Original file (01088-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a reenlistment (RE) code more favorable than the RE-4 he received on 25 March 1999. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected to show that on 25 March 1999, he was dischaarged by-reason of erroneous enlistment, and assigned a reenlistment code of RE-3P in lieu of the code of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03289-01

    Original file (03289-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect: that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a reenlistment received on 5 February 1999. more favorable than the RE-4 he (RE) code 2. He received a reenlistment code of RE-4, He has presented evidence in support of his application which indicates that condition which resulted in his discharge has been corrected. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0081 14

    Original file (NR0081 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Tew, and Ms. White-Olson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 June 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he received an RE-3P vice an RE-3C reentry code on 14 July 1986. b. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05561-10

    Original file (05561-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing block 27 (Reentry Code) of his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) from RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment) to RE-1 (recommended for retention) or RE-2 (ineligible for reenlistment) . The Board finds that neither an RE-1 nor RE-2 reentry...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4634 14

    Original file (NR4634 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 4634-14 29 May 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF i Se, USN, Ref ; (a) 10 U.S.C. In this regard, on 17 February 2004, he was issued a Certificate of Release of Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) which reflected an honorable characterization of service by reason of...