Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05561-10
Original file (05561-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

BIG
Docket No: 5561-10
18 February 2011

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Tos Secretary of the Navy

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref : (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

 

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 10 May 10 w/attachments

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written
application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in
effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing block 27
(Reentry Code) of his Certificate of Release or Discharge from
Active Duty (DD Form 214) from RE-4 (not recommended for
reenlistment) to RE-1 (recommended for retention) or RE-2

(ineligible for reenlistment) .

 

 

2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Barrow and Messrs. Clemmons
and J. Hicks, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 15

February 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken

on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,

finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies which were available under existing law
and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Petitioner entered active duty in the Navy on 19
September 2007. His record in incomplete, but it appears that
he was given a mental health evaluation, and found to be
suffering from situational psychological problems that
interfered with the performance of his duties. His mother had
recently passed away and his father had a heart attack. He was
administratively separated with an uncharacterized entry level
separation and assigned an RE-4 reentry code.

 

c. Petitioner submitted a letter from his doctor stating,
that in his opinion, he is currently no longer suffering from
any type of psychological issues that would prevent him from
successfully serving in the armed forces.

d. An RE-3P (condition not a disability) reentry code
could have been assigned to Petitioner under the circumstances
of his case. It is a waivable code. :

¥

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice
warranting partial relief.

 

The Board finds that neither an RE-1 nor RE-2 reentry code were
appropriate in Petitioner's circumstances. However, an RE-3P
should have been assigned to allow future reenlistment if his
psychological issues were resolved. The Board believes that he
was erroneously assigned an RE-4 reentry code, and it should be
upgraded to RE-3P.

 

In view of the above, the Board directs the following limited
corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by
changing block 27 (Reentry Code) of his DD Form 214 from RE-4
to RE-3P.

 

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner’s naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner’s naval record.

Cs That no further relief be granted.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum

was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that
the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Ava. .
BRIAN J*Y GEORGE
Acting Recorder

 

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of

Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it
is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken
under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the

Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Ras

W. DEAN PF
Executive

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0081 14

    Original file (NR0081 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Tew, and Ms. White-Olson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 June 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he received an RE-3P vice an RE-3C reentry code on 14 July 1986. b. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR408 14

    Original file (NR408 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code, issued on 7 March 2013, be changed. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Boyd, and Ms. Countryman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 June 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2971 14

    Original file (NR2971 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    >, The Board, consisting of Mr. Hedrick, Mr. Sproul and Ms. Polk, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Subsequently, the BOI recommended that he be separated with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge. The Board concludes that relief in the form of his assigned RE-3P reentry code be changed to read...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4153 14

    Original file (NR4153 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her narrative reason for separation (fraudulent entry), separation designator (SPD) code (JDA1) and reenlistment code (RE-3P) be changed. e. As a result of the foregoing, Petitioner was recommended for an administrative separation due to fraudulent entry, and on 14 August 2013, she was so discharged. Specifically, the Board directed that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05849 11

    Original file (05849 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 5849-11 9 March 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF ental eI C0 Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change of his narrative reason for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01685-07

    Original file (01685-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was honorably discharged by reason of Secretarial Authority and assigned a reentry code (RE code) of RE-I, or in the alternative, that he was honorably discharged and assigned an RE code of RE-3G. He submits evidence of his good post service conduct and achievements, and a report...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11095-07

    Original file (11095-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 also reflects an RE-3P reenlistment code. As such, the Board concludes that an RE-1B reenlistment code, which is also authorized by regulatory guidance for a Marine who was not recommended for retention, but was otherwise recommended for reenlistment at the completion of his obligated service, is more appropriate for Petitioner's Situation. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02165-00

    Original file (02165-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    LeBlanc reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 August 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code, RE-3P. (e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08843-09

    Original file (08843-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former lance corporal of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting the narrative reason (“Personality Disorder”), JFX1 separation code, and RE-4 reenlistment code be changed. His case was forwarded to the separation authority, and on 4 August 2005, he received a general discharge and was assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code due to a “Personality Disorder”. The Board finds an impropriety in his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00690-10

    Original file (00690-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that dates of Time Lost on his DD-214 be corrected from 60 to 56 days. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures (1) through (3), an advisory opinion, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. e. The Board requested an advisory opinion in this case from...