DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
NAVY
ANNEX
2
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No. 03039-03
29 August 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 28 August 2003.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that although you were hospitalized for
treatment of depression during the year before your discharge
from the Marine Corps, your symptoms had resolved as of 26
February 1990, when you underwent a pre-separation physical
examination.
You were no longer taking any medication for
depression at that time,
and the physician who conducted the
examination concluded that your depression had resolved, and
that it was not disqualifying for service or discharge. The fact
that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) awarded you a
number of disability ratings effective the day following your
discharge from the Marine Corps was not considered probative of
the existence of error or injustice in your military record,
because the VA makes such awards without regard to the issue of
As you have not demonstrated that
fitness for military service.
you were unfit for duty on 15 March 1990, the Board was unable
Accordingly,
to recommend any corrective action in your case.
your application has been denied.
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and votes of the
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
it is important to keep in mind that
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
,when applying for a correction of an official
Consequently,
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
You are entitled to have
In this regard,
Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13827-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You served on active duty in the Marine Corps from 29 December 2003 to 28 December 2007, when you were voluntarily released from active duty at the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12093-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2010. As you have not demonstrated that you were unfit to reasonably perform the duties of your rank on 14 February 2003, when you were released from active duty, or on 15 August 2003, when you were voluntarily transferred to the IRR, your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8290 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Dac Docket No. ‘A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 December 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03617-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting session, considered your application on 15 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. PHYSICAL BECAUSE OF DISABILITY. AFTER CAREFUL REVIEW OF ALL THE AVAILABLE EVIDENCE AND BASED ON UNANIMOUS OPINION OF THE HEARING PANEL, THE PHYSICAL EVALUATION BOARD FINDS THE MEMBER UNFIT FOR FULL DUTY IN THE U.S....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04090-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2010. In this regard, the Board noted that the VA assigned ratings to the lumbosacral strain and radiculopathy without regard to the issue of your fitness to reasonably perform military duty prior to your discharge, and that the rating you received for a mood disorder was based on your condition more than eighteen months after you were discharged from...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02336-00
You were evaluated by a Navy psychiatrist on 11 March 1997, and reported that you felt the Paxil was helping and that you were feeling much better. The increase was based on a report of treatment dated 30 November 1998, and a VA rating examination conducted on 4 May 1999, which indicated your depressive symptoms had increased in severity The Board noted that in order to qualify for disability separation or retirement from the Armed Forces, a service member must be found unfit to perform the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05140-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2009. It recommended that you be discharged by reason of enlisted in error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11700-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 September 2011. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05954-03
Osgood- In this regard, The Board noted that your receipt of a disability benefits from the VA does not demonstrate that your discharge from the Marine Corps was erroneous. As you have not demonstrated that any of the conditions rated by the VA, either separately or in combination with others, rendered you unfit for duty at the time of your discharge from the Marine Corps, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 01067-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. While there is no evidence that an Axis I psychiatric condition rendered Subject unfit for duty, there is adequate evidence that a personality disorder rendered him unsuitable.