DEPARTMENTOFTHENAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2
NAVY
ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
FC
Docket No: 02596-03
29 August 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 27 August 2003.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
of your application,
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
together with all material submitted in
Your allegations of error and
'..regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You served without incident until 6 October 1965,
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 17 December 1964
at age 17.
when you were convicted by civil court of possessing a false
identification card.
punishment (NJP) for failure to obey an order and were awarded
forfeitures of pay and reduction to
On 4 January 1966, you received nonjudicial
paygrade E-l.
On 6 January 1966, you were diagnosed with an immature
personality characterized by strong dependency needs and poor
On 13 January 1966, you were notified of
impulse controls.
administrative separation processing,
statement.
recommended discharge by reason of unsuitability.
1966, the separation authority directed separation with the type
of discharge warranted by the service record.
1966, you were separated with a general discharge.
On 14 January 1966, the commanding officer
and you elected to make a
On 17 December
On 27 January
Characterization of service is determined, in part, by conduct
and overall trait averages computed from marks assigned on a
periodic basis.
trait average was 2.37.
overall traits were required at the time of your separation for a
fully honorable characterization of service.
Your conduct average was 2.05 and your overall
Averages of 3.0 in conduct and 2.7 in
the Board carefully weighed all
In its review of your case,
potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and
immaturity, and the length of time that has passed since you
However, the Board found that
were discharged from the Navy.
these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization
of your discharge given your failure to obtain the conduct and
overall trait averages required for a fully honorable
characterization of service.
been denied.
will be furnished upon request.
The names and votes of the members of the panel
Accordingly, your application has
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
it is important to keep in mind that
You are entitled to have
In this regard,
Sincerely,
Executive
Di
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10415-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. separation by reason of unsuitability, stating in part, that further retention in the service would not be in the best interest of the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03093-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 11 September 1970, the separation authority approved the discharge recommendation and directed discharge by reason of unsuitability, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07844-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Board. Your conduct average was 3.8. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02274-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07783-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 7 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 31 December Your record reflects that during the 1964 at the age of 17. period from 4 June to 23 October 1965 you received...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10210-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2003. Subsequently, you were notified of pending separation action by reason of unsuitability due to the diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02060-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03949-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. (NJP) for The During the period from 15 March to 12 July 1966 you received NJP on three more occasions for failure to go to your appointed place of duty, absence from your appointed place of duty, two specifications of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05843-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 4 October 1965 at the age of 22 and served on active duty for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9802013
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...