Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01966-03
Original file (01966-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 1966-03
10 June 2003

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 10 June 2003.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNRC, N3330,

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

Your allegations of error and injustice were

 

email, of 22 May 2003, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  such that favorable action cannot be taken.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

From:
Sent:
To:
cc:
Subject:

Document.pdf

I recommend disapproval of the attached request.

The person referred,

Ma'am,

entered into the Civil Engineering Corp
he signed Service Agreement provided by ENS

(CE

page 

1,

l.a.(4),

the member is only eligible for advancemen

paragraph 
rate/paygrade upon referring a lead which results in an accession to the
NUPOC, Nuclear Power Instructor 
is not an applicable program.
me know.
V/R

(NPI)  or Naval Reactors 

If you have any further questions please let

(NR)  program".

CEC

w  LT, USN

NUPOC Program Manager
Navy Recruiting Headquarters, N3330
(901) 874-9228 (voice)
armstrongi@cnrc.navy.mil

(901) 874-9480 (Fax)

*

@navy-mill

LT.

If you need a more formal request for input let me know.

Assistant for BCNR Matters
pOOzcb
Navy Personnel Command
901-874-3043/dsn  882-3043
visit us on the web:

http://www,persnet.navy.mil/congressional/BCNR.htm

-----Original Message-----
From: POOZCS 
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003  
To:
Subject:

POOZCB@persnet.navy.mil

Scanned document from POOZCS

lo:06

[mailto:p00zcsBpersnet.navy.mill

To view the attached document vou need a (PDF) Portable Document Format
viewer. If
not have a
website  at

your E-mail software does not support PDF attachments or you do
you may download a viewer free of charge from the Adobe
viewer,
http://www.adobe.com.

HP Network

ScanJet  5 Scanner ID: 

HPSJOOOO245OlFAE

1

BUPERS\POOZCS

User ID: 
------
Attachments are virus free!

This message has been scanned for viruses at the originating end by
Nemx  Anti-Virus for MS Exchange Server/IMC

http://www.nemx.com/products/antivirus

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07431-00

    Original file (07431-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the Navy Personnel Command the memorandum for the record dated 5 March 2001, and the NPC opinion dated 6 March 2001 with enclosure, copies of which are attached. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the PERS-85 advisory opinion dated 6 March 2001 in finding that your date of rank should not be adjusted because you would not have rated an adjustment when you came on active duty, had you requested one. r October 1996 of rank adjustment...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01188-02

    Original file (01188-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 1 October 2002 118842 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United Stares Code, section 1552. Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on were reviewed in accordance...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04731-03

    Original file (04731-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (b), the educational benefit program available to servicemembers entering active duty for the first time from 1 January 1977 through 30 June 1985 was VEAP. Reference (c) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active duty servicemembers with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01349-06

    Original file (01349-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by NPC memorandum 1920, Ser 4834/031, 21 Jun 06 and NPC letter, 5420 POOJ6/1l3, 19 October 2006, a copy of each is attached. Members advanced under these procedures must be serving, in temporary officer status on the date enlisted advancement is effected.6. Accordingly,met both requirements in Aug 04, and his advancement to E—8 would have been effective 1 Jul 04.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01184-02

    Original file (01184-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 7220 Pers 823 of 22 April 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03107-08

    Original file (03107-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2008. Sailor petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors and/or remove injustices in his Physical Readiness Information Management System (PRIMS) record. This is an advisory memorandum for the use of the Board for Correction of Naval Records only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00094-03

    Original file (00094-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (c) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment) . Additionally, since XXX was not a VEAP participant, he was not eligible for conversion to the MGIB Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02023-08

    Original file (02023-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. 2023-08 28 Jul 08 Dear

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07063-09

    Original file (07063-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ‘all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerel 4 W. DEAN PE Executive D Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND 5722 INTEGRITY DR. iN...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03647-09

    Original file (03647-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memo 1133 Ser N5312/09047 of 28 May 09, a copy of which is attached. Petitioner has applied to the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) seeking to have member’s Navy record changed.