DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 N A V Y A N N E X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
FC
Docket No: 01861-03
21 August 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 13 August 2003. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
prior letter to you from Headquarters, Marine Corps (HQMC) dated
9 July 1992, a copy of which is enclosed.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the HQMC letter.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request .
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are ent
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important toekeep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
are such
itled to have
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Enclosure
, % j
' . DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20380.0091
IN REPLY RErER TO.
1040
MM- 5 \RE
9 J u ~ 92
his is in reply to your inquiry of January 15, 1992 regarding
your reenlistment code.
A service record review has been conducted and it has been
determined that the reenlistment code of RE-3C you were assigned
was correct. The reenlistment code you received was assigned
based on your overall record of performance while on active duty
and represents the commanding officer's evaluation of your
qualifications for reenlistment at the time of separation. Your
record indicates that you were counseled regarding leadership,
poor attitude and judgment. The disciplinary portion of your
record indicates that you were punished under the Uniform Code
for Military Justice for dereliction of duty for which you were
convicted by a summary court-marital. Once a code is correctly
-- assigned it is not routinely changed or upgraded as a result of
eyents that occur after separation or based merely on the passage
of time.
If you are not satisfied with the determination made concerning
the assignment of your reenlistment code, you have the right ta
petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records to conduct an
additional review. This may be done by submitting the enclosed
Application for correction of Military or Naval Record (DD Form
149) to the Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records,
Department of the Navy, Washington, DC 20370-5100. It is
necessary that a copy of this letter be attached to your
application.
I regret that a more favorable response is not possible; however,
I hope this answers your inquiry.
sincerely ,
~ e v i e w Branch
Personnel Management Division
By direction of the Commandant.
of the.MawQe Corps
Encl :
(1) DD Form 149
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05178-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the letter furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) dated 25 September 2003, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06663-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 2O37O-5100 RSDocket No: 6663-06 7 September 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 September 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04156-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 October 2005. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Your service record has been reviewed and it has been determined bhat your reenlistment code of RE-4B was correctly assigned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03664-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your reenlistment code was assigned based on your overall record of performance while on active duty and means that you were not eligible for reenlistment at the time of separation and the disqualifying factor is not covered by another reenlistment code or the code was directed by the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01798-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. If after thirty days subsequent to receipt of this letter you have not yet received a DD Form 215 correcting your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05347-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Additionally, the Bureau of Naval Personnel informed you on June 24, 1992, and March 8, 1995, that there was no evidence in your records that you were ever injured under conditions which would qualify for the Purple Heart Medal.During the period that you served in the Marine Corps, the Purple...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04048-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2009. In addition, the Board considered the attached advisory opinion that was furnished to you by the Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Branch (MMER/RE) . Your service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that your reenlistment code of RE-4 was correctly assigned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08948-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2009. Your service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that your reenlistment code of RE-3C was correctly assigned. This may be done by submitting the enclosed Application for Correction of Military Record (DD Form 149) to the Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records, Department of the Navy, Washington, DC 20370-5100.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10020-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the letter furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC), dated 13 December 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02021-99
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by HQMC, dated 24 May 1999, and the Marine Corps Recruiting Command, dated 12 July 1999, copies of which are attached. a. Petitioner seeks removal from his records of all reference to his conviction by summary court-martial. Accordingly, we recommend relief be granted to the extent of ordering the removal from Petitioner's records of all references to his conviction at summary court-martial and all performance evaluations or...