‘DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 .
TUR
Docket No: 4048-09
4 August 2009
f
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 August 2009. The names and votes of the
members “of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In addition, the
Board considered the attached advisory opinion that was furnished
to you by the Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Branch
(MMER/RE) .
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this regard, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Enclosure
PEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
3280 RUSSELL ROAD
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22734-S103
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1040
MMER/RE-
OT Tle 200
This is in reply to your inguiry of December 4, 2000 regarding
the assignment of your reenlistment code.
Your service record has been reviewed and it has been determined
that your reenlistment code of RE-4 was correctly assigned.
Your reenlistment code was assigned based on your overall record
and means that you were not recommended for reenlistment at .
the time of separation. Your record indicates that you were
- honorably discharged on June 30, 1994 by reason of Completion
of Required Obligated Service. The administrative portion of
your record indicates that you were counseled concerning your
disregard for your responsibilities as a husband and father,
and financial irresponsibility. It is also noted that the
Commandant of the Marine Corps authorized full payment of
enlisted separation pay and directed the assignment of the RE-4
reenlistment code. After a review of all relevant information,
this Headquarters concurs in the professional evaluation of your
qualifications for reenlistment at the time of separation. Once
a code is correctly assigned it is not routinely changed or
upgraded as a result of events that occur after separation or
based merely.on the passage of time.
If you are not satisfied with the determination made concerning
the assignment of your reeniistment code, you have the right to
petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records to conduct an
additional review. This may be done by submitting the enclosed
Application for Correction of Military Record (DD Form 149) to
the Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records, Department
of the Navy, Washington, DC 20370-5160. It is necessary that a
copy of this letter be attached to your application.
I regret that a more favorable response is not possible; however,
fo trust this satisfactorily answers your inquiry.
Sincerely,
Head, Performance Evaluation
Review Branch
Personnel Management Division
By direction of the Commandant
of the Marine Corps
Enel:
{1) BD Form 143
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08948-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2009. Your service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that your reenlistment code of RE-3C was correctly assigned. This may be done by submitting the enclosed Application for Correction of Military Record (DD Form 149) to the Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records, Department of the Navy, Washington, DC 20370-5100.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03664-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your reenlistment code was assigned based on your overall record of performance while on active duty and means that you were not eligible for reenlistment at the time of separation and the disqualifying factor is not covered by another reenlistment code or the code was directed by the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05178-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the letter furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) dated 25 September 2003, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02943-00
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2001. in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03387-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05415-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03211-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reenlistment code was assigned based on her overall record and means that she did not meet the physical/ medical standards for reenlistment at the time of separation. Once a code The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an 4 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05850-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The reenlistment code was assigned based on his overall record and means that he did not meet the physical/ medical standards for reenlistment at the time of separation. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05343-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 12 June 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00716-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.