DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
ii BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
MEH:ddj
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
End: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Series of Documents
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone “A”
Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the CTO rating (NEC 2735).
2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Leeman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms.
McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on
15 April 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), Petitioner
submitted documentation showing that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Docket No: 1685-03
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show
that:
a. The reenlistment executed on or about 9 August 2002 is for a
term of 5 years, vice 4 years.
b. This change will allow petitioner to cancel the non operative
24 month extension as the reenlistment will take him two years beyond
existing EAOS as extended. Consequently, he will be entitled to an
increased amount of zone “A” SRB, award level 3.5, for the CTO rating (NEC
2735).
c. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for
Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the
Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN . L. ADAMS
Recorder cting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of
the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32
Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing
corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been
approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
15 April 2003
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08221-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 8221-02 17 December 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05637-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone "B" Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the IT rating (NEC 2735). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunne, Frankfurt, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 October 2003 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04765-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the IT rating (NEC 2735). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Harrison, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 August 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05296-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone IT rating (NEC 2735). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Milner, and Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 4 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01396-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone "C" Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the IT rating (NEC 2735). The Board, consisting of Mr. Leeman, Ms. McCormick, and Ms. Wiley , reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08319-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone IT rating (NEC 2735). “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the 2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. Lippolis, and Ms. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08318-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone IT rating (NEC 2735). The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. Lippolis, and Ms. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07062-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone IT rating (NEC 2735). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01141-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the IT rating (NEC 2735). The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 May 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04052-04
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the IT rating(NEC 2735). The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. Nicholson, and Ms. Gilbert reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 July 2004 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...