Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01156
Original file (ND99-01156.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-EM3, USN
Docket No. ND99-01156

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 990826, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to Honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000522. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS/PERSONALITY DISORDER, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-122 (formerly 3620225).


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

 1. I believe the record to be in error or unjust due to my receiving a medical diagnosis from Naval Hospital Groton, CT as having a Personality Disorder (Adjustment Disorder) due to being claustrophobic and was erroneously processed for an Administrative Discharge in lieu of being processed for a Medical Discharge. Additionally, I met the criteria for having an honorable discharge per reference (a) (MILPERSMAN) in as much as I had only 1 NJP and my performance evaluations were commensurate with an Honorable Discharge.

In support of this application I am enclosing a copy of my DD214 and a copy of the medical diagnosis from Naval Hospital Groton, CT.

On a personal note, I am dismayed why my command circumvented the established procedures for persons in my situation and look to you first for assistance in overturning this poor decision. If necessary, I will explore all other options including writing to my political representatives. The impact of a General Discharge precludes me from using my G.I. Bill to continue my education. I have not been in any trouble since my discharge and have been employed. Thank you very must for your attention in this matter.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214 (2 copies)
Mental Health Dept, Naval Ambulatory Care Center, Groton, CT consultation dated 09Feb98 (2 pages)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     941220 - 950827  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 950828               Date of Discharge: 980223

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 05 27
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4 (24 month extension)

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 96

 Highest Rate: EM3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2.0 (1)     Behavior: 1.0 (1)                 OTA: 1.67 (5.0 eval)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, LOC

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/PERSONALITY DISORDER, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-122 (formerly 3620225).

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

970422:  Mental Health Dept, NAVHOSP, Groton, CT: Pt has orders to got to submarine. Originally volunteered for this duty. Slightly anxious. No history claustrophobia/depression or anxiety. Not trying to "get out" - just a little concerned. No suicidal/homicidal ideation.
         Assessment/Plan: Anxiety related to going to sub. Still qualified, reassure/educate. Follow-up with FSC, with sub IDC. Returned to full duty and follow-up as necessary.

970904:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance (deficiency in qual progress), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

971106:  Counseling: Discussed past history of problem, discussed options with respect to medical/psych eval, evaluated possible causes of member's problem and advised of doing better in quals, notified of corrective actions and assistance available. The applicant had to be relieved of watch standing/CAS assistant team responsibilities, due to his inability to support the watch team. He stated that he did not feel that he could wear an EAB if the need arose. This is the third incident of this nature.

971015:  Med Dept Rep, USS OKLAHOMA CITY: Applicant found fit for submarine duty.
971203:  Mental Health Dept, NAVHOSP, Groton, CT: CHIEF COMPLIANT: "I have these panic attacks that occur usually in the morning or night or whenever I put on an EAB. In response to the inquiry. In what way can we halp you with your problem? he wrote on his questionnaire, "transfer me to the surface fleet or if this is not possible to a shore command or possibly even out the Navy."
         CURRENT MENTAL EXAM: Pt is oriented times five. Denies current suicidal thoughts and/or intent. Affect and mood are anxious. Were no symptoms of a thought disorder. Were no indications of major depression. He made it clear that he had been unhappy aboard the USS OKLAHOMA CITY and that he was sorry he volunteered for submarine duty.
         IMPRESSION: AXIS I - Adjustment Disorder
         AXIS II -
         AXIS III -
         AXIS IV - Routine stresses of military life
         AXIS V - GAF: 85
         PLAN: Is psychiatrically fit for full duty in my opinion. It appears to me that his discomfort with the EAB and with the submarine environment in general has been exacerbated by his intense dislike of Naval service. The symptoms he reports have inherent secondary gain aspects. Recommendation to EM3 (Applicant) was that (1) he remain aboard the USS OKLAHOMA CITY and go underway to the eventual duty station in Virginia, (2) he continue to see Mr. A_ for supportive psychotherapy, and (3) if the problems persist after he arrives in Virginia, to go for reevaluation at the Mental Health Department at Portsmouth. Prognosis - Fair due to lack of motivation.
980115:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: unauthorized absence in that EM3 (Applicant) did, on or about 1445.08JAN06, without authority, failed to report to his reported place of duty, to wit, USS OKLAHOMA CITY (SSN 723) located at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Portsmouth, NH and did remain so absent until on or about 0903, 98JAN09.
         Award: Forfeiture of $604.00 per month for 2 months, restriction to ship for 60 days, reduction to E-X. No indication of appeal in the record.
980209:  Mental Health Dept, Naval Ambulatory Care Center, Groton, CT: CHIEF COMPLAINT: Pt reported to his command in January 198 that he was having suicidal thoughts and he was transferred TAD to Group 2 for further assessment.
PRESENT ILLNESS: Pt has been treated at the Social Work Dept since early Oct for reported panic-like symptoms. Referred to the MHC in Groton for additional eval in Dec 97. Recommendation made at that time that he continue aboard the USS OKLAHOMA CITY and further recommended that pt seek further mental health eval should his anxiety continue after the boat transferred to Norfolk. It was thought that the secondary gain of getting off the boat was mitigating any positive gain from treatment. On return to boat, pt began to report fleeting suicidal impulses which resulted in TAD assignment. It now appears that his dislike of naval service and difficulty adjusting has brought his character deficits to surface and that his personality is so disordered that he is unsuitable for further naval service.
CURRENT MENTAL EXAM: Pt is oriented times five. Denies current suicidal thoughts and/or intent, Affect and mood are anxious. Did admit that he "feels much better since his removal from the USS OKLAHOMA". There were no symptoms of thought disorder. There were no indications of major depression. He made it clear that he had been unhappy aboard the USS OKLAHOMA CITY and that he was sorry he volunteered for submarine duty. Denies illicit drug use or alcohol use.
IMPRESSION: AXIS I - Adjustment Disorder
AXIS II - Personality Disorder, NOS, manifested by marked immaturity, suicidal thoughts, poor stress coping skills
AXIS III -
AXIS IV - Routine stresses of military life
AXIS V - GAF:85
PLAN: This 19 y/o, single, male EM3/USN/AD is psychiatrically unsuitable for full duty in my opinion. .........................It appears now that the only practical plan for EM3 (Applicant) considering his escalation to suicidal thoughts, is to recommended that he be considered for administrative discharge from active duty due to a preexisting and severe personality disorder. Pt will be followed by this clinic until discharged. Prognosis - good, if discharged.

 980212:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge general (under honorable conditions) by reason of convenience of the government on the basis of a diagnosed personality disorder as evidenced by your Psychiatric Evaluation of Preexisting and Severe Personality disorder on 11 Feb 98.
980212:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

980511:  COMSUBGRU TWO advised BUPERS that applicant was discharged with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of convenience of the government on the basis of a personality disorder.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 980223 General (under Honorable conditions) for Convenience of the government on the basis of a diagnosed personality disorder. (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board determined this issue is without merit. The applicant made the following claims: He was erroneously processed for Administrative Discharge vice medical discharge; he only had 1 NJP; and his marks were commensurate with an Honorable discharge. The applicant’s service record contains documentation to show he was diagnosed with a personality disorder by competent medical authority. Additionally, personality disorder is not a severe enough disorder to qualify the applicant for a medical discharge. The applicant had one NJP, for unauthorized absence, in addition to formal counseling for substandard performance in obtaining his boat qualifications. His evaluation marks were 2.0 in performance, 1.0 in behavior and 1.67 overall, which are below the cutoff for honorable performance (1.99). The applicant’s military service was not honorable and his discharge was proper and equitable. Relief denied.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective
12 Dec 97 until 31 Aug 1998, Article 1910-122 (formerly 3620225), SEPARATION BY REASON OF CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT - PERSONALITY DISORDER(S).

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to:
                  DA Military Review Boards Agency
                  Management Information and Support Directorate
                  Armed Forces Reading Room
                  Washington, D.C. 20310-1809

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  Washington Navy Yard
                  720 Kennon St SE Rm 309
                  Washington, D.C. 20374-5023     


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600105

    Original file (ND0600105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    That boat was the cause of my medical problems. I think I’m out of the Navy why am I back here? My discharge was wrongly assessed and needs to be changed to a honorable discharge under medical conditions.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600935

    Original file (ND0600935.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 4)Five pages from the Applicant’s Service Record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20010328 - 20010726 COG Active: None Period...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00972

    Original file (ND01-00972.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00972 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010725, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to medical reason. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant’s issue asserts that his medical condition mitigated his...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600428

    Original file (ND0600428.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    - Patient is NOT medically clear to participate in the SARP program at this time. (0): Mental status examination reveals a well groomed, articulate, and sophisticated 24year old, male in acute distress He is dressed in the uniform of the day The patient was alert and oriented and attentive to the interview He speaks in a slow, deliberate style with a clear voice and has good eye contact Thought processes are logical and linear There is no evidence of disturbances in thought content Mood is...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01174

    Original file (ND99-01174.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-01174 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990903, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. 980215: Mental Health Clinic, USS INDEPENDENCE: Pt, Pt's DivOff, Pt's LCPO and this provider met with pt in conference to clarify pt's short/long term goals. AXIS III: No known or reported medical conditions.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00729

    Original file (ND03-00729.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “On behalf of the above referenced applicant, and in accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166; SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the following informal comments; and/or issue(s). Evaluation done by Dr. N_ who recommended pt be administratively separated from the Navy. It is possible that due to her adjustment disorder or depressive disorder NOS triggered by occupational stress, that...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01378

    Original file (ND04-01378.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Accordingly, I have directed his General (under Honorable Conditions) separation for convenience of the government due to a personality disorder.] The Applicant does not deny that he was suffering from a personality disorder at the time of his discharge from naval service.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600056

    Original file (ND0600056.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant is not currently suicidal. Plan: (1) Applicant readily agrees to present to corpsman on ship if suicidal ideations recur. Regarding the presumption of regularity in government affairs, in the absence of the administrative separation package, the Board presumed that the Applicant was properly notified of the proposed separation, afforded the opportunity to elect or waive his applicable rights, and that the separation authority approved the basis for discharge and characterization...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | n0300386

    Original file (n0300386.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00386 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030107. This recommendation requires counseling & documentation that the personality disorder interferes with the performance of duty. [PARTIAL DISCHARGE PACKAGE MISSING] PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19921223 under honorable conditions (general) for convenience of the government on the basis of a diagnosed personality disorder of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00237

    Original file (ND99-00237.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he sometimes feels his life is going no where. States no homicidal ideations, states suicidal ideations. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge and reason for discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The Board does not have the authority to change a discharge to a medical discharge as the applicant requests in issue 1.