Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08867-02
Original file (08867-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

JRE
Docket No: 8867-02
2 December 2002

This is in reference  to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section

1552.

 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 21 November 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found

 

that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

The Board found that you entered on active duty as a member of the Naval Reserve on 6
December 1982. Shortly thereafter, you were extradited to the state of Missouri, where you
were tried for selling illegal drugs.
control on 22 April 1983. You were discharged by reason of misconduct on 4 August 1983.

The Board noted that a discharge by reason of misconduct takes precedence over, and
precludes, disability evaluation processing.
available records that you suffered from any condition which rendered you unfit by reason of
physical disability. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.

it is

_

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03393-02

    Original file (03393-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge, given your repeated use of drugs and other misconduct that resulted in three disciplinary actions in less than two years of service. Consequently, when...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04012-01

    Original file (04012-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The PEB made preliminary findings that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability incurred as a result of your own misconduct, and therefore not ratable. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03885-02

    Original file (03885-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. paygrade E-l. a $287 forfeiture of pay, On 16 December 1983 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02585-02

    Original file (02585-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 WMP Docket No: 19 August 2002 2585-02 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code section 1552. considered your A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 14 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02228-02

    Original file (02228-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 TJR Docket No: 2228-02 19 September 2002 This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05355-02

    Original file (05355-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted Board. of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 3 January...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01984-02

    Original file (01984-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. On 14 June 1983 the commanding officer recommended that you be separated with an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct and unsuitability based...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03041-02

    Original file (03041-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. On 21 August 1983 the discharge authority then directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct, and on 31 August 1983 you were so discharged. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02421-02

    Original file (02421-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. concluded these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your repetitive disciplinary actions, your drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08114-01

    Original file (08114-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 16 September 1983 the discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed an other than honorable discharge, and on 21 September 1983 you were so...