DEPARTMENT OF THE
‘NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 1984-02
27 December 2002
Your allegations of error and
application for correction of your
provisions of Title 10, United
This is in reference to your
naval record pursuant to the
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 December 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 24 June 1981.
The record reflects that you received six nonjudicial
punishments.
The offenses included unauthorized absences
totalling eleven days, attempted assault, absence from your
appointed place of duty on four occasions, making a false
official statement, destruction of government property, and
failure to obey a lawful order.
On 14 June 1983 the commanding officer recommended that you be
separated with an other than honorable discharge by reason of
misconduct and unsuitability based on your attempt to jump off
the flight deck.
elected to waive the right to present your case to an
administrative discharge board.
After review by the discharge
authority,
11 July 1983 you received an other than honorable discharge by
reason of misconduct.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
When informed of the recommendation, you
the recommendation for separation was approved and on
However, the Board concluded that these factors were
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
immaturity.
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge,
given your record of frequent involvement with military
In this regard, the Board noted that you were the
authorities.
subject of six disciplinary actions within a period of less than
the Board concluded that no
three years.
Based on the foregoing,
Accordingly, your
change to the discharge is warranted.
The names and votes of the members
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
You are entitled to have the
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06772-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 6 February 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 1 April 1983 the discharge authority directed discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. that the foregoing factors and contentions were insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02441-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. On 14 December 1982 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and commission of a serious offense as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04342-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, service in the Naval Reserve and your initial period of good service in the Marine Corps. Consequently, when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02748-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 January 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when an individual is discharged for misconduct and is not recommended for retention.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06032-01
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 28 June 1982 for The record reflects that you were advanced four years at age 21. to BTFA (E-2) and served without incident until 25 February 1983, when you were convicted by special court-martial of communicating You were sentenced to confinement at hard a threat and assault. On 8 April 1983 the convening authority approved the You were released from During the 16 month period from September 1983 to January 1985 Your offenses you received...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06892-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 May 2009. The discharge authority then directed discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04041-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together.with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01600-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2000. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your record reflects that on 2 July 1982 The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 28 January 1981 at the age of 19. you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for two periods of absence from your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02118-02
Shortly thereafter, on 19 February 1987, you were notified that administrative separation action had been initiated by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by your use of cocaine and marijuana. Immediate administrative Failure to This recommendation further stated that your two On 27 February 1987 your commanding officer recommended an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03822-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 8 November 1983 at age 18 and served without disciplinary incident until...