Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06969-02
Original file (06969-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP : ddj
Docket No: 6969092
3 December 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

december 2002.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 3  
Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 7220 Pers 822 of 1 November 2002, a copy of which
attached.

-

is

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

*.

DEPARTMENT 

OF THE NAV

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE

Y
 

CORk’$

3280 RUSSELL ROAD

QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 221 34-5103

IN REPLY REFER TO:
1040
MRV

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

ON IN THE CASE OF

c

Major

1 .
1979.
for service members who first entered active duty between 1 January
1977 and 30 June 1985.

The Veterans Education Assistance Program  

entered active duty in the Marine Corps 29 May

(VEAP)  was available

Major

2.
has used 31 months and 3 days of his Chapter 32 
information was provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

records indicate he made VEAP contributions and

(VEAP)  benefits. This

states that he should be afforded the opportunity

There were two open

Benefit program.

in MGIB Educational

3.
Major
to enroll
enrollments for VEAP era participants to enroll in MGIB.
enrollment period started 9 
second period was from 1 Nov 2000 through 31 
enrollment period stipulated that the member had
continuous active duty from 9 
Major
not have been eligible for the second conversion
participated in the first conversion.

etting out of the Marine Corps

Ott  1996 and ended 8

Ott  1996 through 1

Ott

The first

Ott  1997 and the
2001.
The second
to have served on
Apr 2000.
Due to
31 Jan 2000 he would
but could have

should have been notified by his administrative

ALMAR  

053/97  provided the guidelines for the

4.
Major
section of his eligibility for the
provisions that would allow Major
into MGIB,
stipulated in Public Law 104-275 Section 106.

he would have had to enroll

while

first conversion,

There are currently no
he opportunity to enroll
on active duty as

Based on the information that has been provided,

5.
recommends that no change be made to Major
record.

this office

permanent

point of contact concernin
at COMM: (703) 784-9644 or



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10843-07

    Original file (10843-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1780 PER5-352G of 23 Jan 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06899-01

    Original file (06899-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by attached. It was closed to new enrollments on 30 June 1985, Members who did not enroll before these deadlines request to enroll (VEAP). who did not references participate in VEAP.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06390-01

    Original file (06390-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers 604 of 4 October 2001, a copy of which is attached. references (c) and (d) for members like Chie participate in VEAP.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05606-07

    Original file (05606-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    5606-07 28 Aug 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2007. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1780 PERS-352G of 27 Jul 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06291-03

    Original file (06291-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (d) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06895-01

    Original file (06895-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. references (c) and (d) for members like EN1 participate in VEAP. A review of enroll in VEAP before the not eligible for VEAP benefits.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09111-07

    Original file (09111-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1780 PERS-352G of 26 Nov 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (c) offered the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06434-03

    Original file (06434-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Following enactment of reference (c), Navy attempted widest dissemination of the opportunity for eligible personnel to convert to the MGIB Program. Other notification was provided in ample time for members who didn't receive a letter to contact PERS-604 about their eligibility before the legislated deadline.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00488-07

    Original file (00488-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1780 Ser 352G/254 of 20 Feb 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (c) offered the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09043-05

    Original file (09043-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (b), the Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP) was available to members who entered the military for the first time between 1 January 1977 and 30 June 1985.