DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG
Docket No: 8233-02
25 June 2003
This is in reference to your
naval record pursuant to the
States Code, section 1552.
application for correction of your
provisions of Title 10 of the United
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 17 June 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
and policies.
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which
is enclosed.
Your allegations of error and
.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
The Board noted that there is no evidence in the record to show
that you were actually recommended for promotion.
regard, during your last enlistment you received a nonjudicial
punishment and four page 11 counseling entries.
1998 your enlistment was extended for two months so you could
compete for remedial promotion,
In this connection the Board substantially
but you were not promoted.
In this
Further, in June
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENTOFTHENAVY
READQUARTRRS
UNM ‘RD STATES MARINE CORPS
MANPOWRRANDRRSRRVRAFhJRSDRPARTMR.NT
t
RARRYLRRRALL,17LRJRUNRROAD
QUANTICO,
I’IRGJ.NIA
22l34-5104
/’
'
f@tjpbypsFER To:
MMPR-2
~,252#3
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
ADVISORY OP
CASE OF
Ref:
(a) BCNR Docket No:
(b)
MC0
P1400.32B ENLPROMMAN
8233-02 OF 7 Mar 03
Per reference
1.
the rank of sergeant.
(a),r111(11$11; requests to be promoted to
2 .
He was assigned an RE-4 code on 30 March 1998 as a result of
not being recommended for reenlistment.
'paragraph
recommended for reenlistment".
1204.38,
"Marines will not be promoted while not being
Per reference
(b)
sees not meet the requirements to be promoted
3.
the rank of sergeant.
to
Head, Promotion Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07923-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC memorandum is attached. board process precludes Sergean based upon a majority vote of the board members, his record was not competitive with the records of the Marines selected for promotion.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07392-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC memorandum attached. : Enclosure Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director c DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT HARRY LEE HALL, 17 LEJEUNE ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5104 To: IN REPLY...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01685-06
In the alternative, you now request new enlisted remedial selection boards (ERSB’s) for the Calendar Year (CY) 1999, 2000 and 2001 master sergeant and first sergeant selection boards.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2007. The Board found the ~Th’IPR-2 advisory opinion dated 2 August 2006 was correct as to the number of Marines with whom you were compared, despite the indications, in the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07773-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1400 MMPR 2 of 17 October 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03951-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. request contains two prior service with the same date phonecon with Per a time of was discharged...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08183-00
Your request to change your sergeant date of rank to 9 October 1998 was not considered, as the Marine Corps Total Force System already reflects that date. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, they sa 9 his date of rank is MCRC; that MCRC set his date of rank as 1 Jan 95; and that unless BCNR rules otherwise, MMPR-2...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01951-00
selection to Staff Sergeant be revoked. cting recommendation should have been referred to Sergeant comment before it was sent to Headquarters, U.S. Marine Per reference (a), c THE CASE OF SERGEANT Corps. that, isconduct, The delay, in itself, Sergean had the selection board been he likely would have failed did not result in his failure Sergea relief be In a letter supporting etition, the CG, I MEF, For the reasons cited above, we believe omotion would have been revoked 5. recommends that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06187-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 17 and 31 March 2000, copies of which are attached. Branch (RAM-5) reenlisted Staff Sergeant Marine Corps Reserve at the rank of staff sergeant with his enlistment date (980218) as his date of rank.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08059-01
He feels that since his command did not notify CMC to delay his promotion until after his name appeared on the MARADMIN for Staff Noncommissioned Officer promotions for November, he should have been promoted. Following the conviction, his commanding officer recommended revocation of his promotion to gunnery sergeant per reference (a). That same month, Subj: BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS CASE OF STAFF SERGEANT (BCNR) APPLICATION IN THE SMC Petitioner's command recommended that CMC...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06105-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC memorandum is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.