Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08029-02
Original file (08029-02.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                2 NAVY ANNEX
                          WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

                                          JRE
                                                         Docket No: 8029-02

                                                         25 February 2003










    This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
    record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States
    Code, section 1552.

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
    sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21
    February 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
    accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to
    the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the
    Board consisted of your application, together with all material
    submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
    statutes, regulations and policies.

    After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the
    Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish
    the existence of probable material error or injustice.

    The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 30 April 1976. You
    received nonjudicial punishment on nine occasions for a variety of
    offenses, to include multiple drug offenses. You were referred for
    substance abuse evaluation, and disclosed a history of polydrug abuse,
    to include heroin, LSD, “crystal meth”, quaaludes, speed, downers,
    marijuana, hash, PCP, cocaine, and heavy alcohol abuse. You were
    discharged under other than honorable conditions on 28 November 1979,
    by reason of misconduct/drug abuse.

    The Board concluded that your service was appropriately characterized
    with a discharge under other than honorable conditions, given your
    extensive disciplinary record and use of illegal drugs. As you have not
    presented any evidence which indicates that your discharge was
    erroneous, or that it would be in the interest of justice to upgrade
    your discharge, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action
    in your case. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names
    and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable
action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its
decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not
previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep
in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,
the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable
material error or injustice.

                                        Sincerely,



                                        W.    DEAN PFEIFFER
                                        Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05095-10

    Original file (05095-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 21 July 2008, your case was heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB), which voted three to zero in favor of a general discharge due to misconduct (drug abuse). On 18 September 2008, you received the general discharge due to misconduct (drug abuse), and were assigned an RE-4 (not...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05421-02

    Original file (05421-02.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01506-03

    Original file (01506-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Since you have been treated no differently than others discharged for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the discharge...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00146-03

    Original file (00146-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your disciplinary record and especially your use of drugs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07794-08

    Original file (07794-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 3 February 2003, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11181-06

    Original file (11181-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 22 December 1998 at age 25 and served for four years without disciplinary...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05793-09

    Original file (05793-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board did not consider your request for correction of your reentry code, as that request was previously denied, and you have not submitted any new material evidence concerning that request. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04078-03

    Original file (04078-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were discharged from the Navy on 21 September 2002 by reason of fraudulent enlistment because of your concealment of pre-service drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02429-03

    Original file (02429-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2003. The Board found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct, and especially the lengthy period of unauthorized absence of which you were convicted by the special court-martial. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | NR7709 12

    Original file (NR7709 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Rh three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 December 2033 Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administr regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In this regard, it noted that at some time after marijuana is used, x nanograms of THC metabolites will be present in the user’s urine, and that that amount will diminish over time until the...