Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01506-03
Original file (01506-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

BOARD  FOR  CORRECTION  OF  NAVAL  RECORDS 

2  N A V Y A N N E X  

WASHINGTON  D C   20370r5100 

TRG 
Docket No:  1506-03 
31 July 2003 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your 
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United 
States Code section 1552. 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval 
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your 
application on 29 July 2003.  Your allegations of error and 
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative 
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this 
Board.  Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of 
your application, together with all material submitted in support 
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations 
and policies. 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire 
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was 
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material 
error or injustice. 

You were honorably released from active duty on 15 October 1979 
and recommended for preferred reenlistment.  You reenlisted in 
the Navy on 29 May 1981.  During the period from 31 July 1982 to 
22 February 1983, you received nonjudicial punishment on three 
occasions.  Your offenses were two absences from your appointed 
place of duty, and possession and use of cocaine. 

Based on the foregoing record, you were processed for discharge 
by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.  On 22 March 1983 the 
discharge authority approved the recommendation of your 
commanding officer that you be discharged under other than 
honorable conditions.  You were so discharged on 19 April 1983;. 

In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all 
potentially mitigating factors, such as your prior honorable 
service and the documentation showing that you have been steadily 
employed since discharge.  The Board also considered your 
contention that a discharge under other than honorable conditions 
based on one incident of drug abuse was too severe.  However, the 
Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant 
recharacterization of your discharge, given your record of 

aisconduct and especially your use of cocaine.  Regulations 
require separation processing for those individuals who use 
drugs, and they normally are discharged under other than 
honorable conditions.  Since you have been treated no 
differently than others discharged for that reason, the Board 
could not find an error or injustice in the discharge under other 
than honorable conditions. 

Accordingly, your application has been denied.  The names and 
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. 

The Board believes that you are eligible for veterans benefits 
based on your prior honorable service.  Therefore, if you have 
been denied benefits, you should appeal that denial under 
procedures established by the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that 
favorable action cannot be taken.  You are entitled to have the 
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material 
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. 
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a 
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. 
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval 
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the 
existence of probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, $hw Executive Di e 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10749-10

    Original file (10749-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge, given your record of three...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06958-01

    Original file (06958-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2 0 0 2 . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 21 December 1983 your commanding officer recommended you be separated under okher than honorable conditions due to drug abuse.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05523-09

    Original file (05523-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 20 August 1985, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02092-07

    Original file (02092-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06208-06

    Original file (06208-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 October 1986 you received NJP for missing movement, two instances of willful disobedience of a lawful order, and use of an unspecified controlled substance.On 3 November 1986 your commanding officer recommended you for an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Finally, there is no evidence in the record to show that you ever requested or were denied treatment for substance abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04540-01

    Original file (04540-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Drug abuse...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07093-01

    Original file (07093-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your disciplinary record, use of marijuana, and use of cocaine while in a surveillance program. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07506-02

    Original file (07506-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 3 May 2 0 0 3 . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You served for a year without disciplinary incident, but on 3 1 December 1 9 8 1 , you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for dereliction in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11219-09

    Original file (11219-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09401-08

    Original file (09401-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...