Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07737-01
Original file (07737-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD 

FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC

 

20370-5100

TJR
Docket No:  
13 May 2002

7737-01

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code,

Section 1552.

sitting in executive session,

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records,
application on 7 May 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application,
thereof, your naval record,
and policies.

Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of

together with all material submitted in support

and applicable statutes, regulations,

Your allegations of error and

considered your

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record,
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient

The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 18 January
1983 at the age of 23.
period of about eight months.

You then served without incident for a

Your record reflects that on 31 August 1983 you became an
unauthorized absentee from your unit in Camp Lejeune, NC and were
immediately declared a deserter.
apprehended and confined by civil authorities in Houston, TX. On
1 September 1983 you were returned, under escort, to your unit.

Later that day you were

The record further reflects that on 22 September 1983 you
submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order
to avoid trial by court-martial for desertion.
that prior to submitting this request,
you conferred with a
qualified military lawyer at which time you were advised of your
rights and warned of the probable adverse consequences of
accepting such a discharge.
discharge was granted and your commanding officer was directed to
issue you an undesirable discharge.
you were spared the stigma of a court-martial conviction and the

Subsequently, your request for

As a result of this action,

Your record shows

potential penalties of a punitive discharge and confinement at
hard labor.
On 31 October 1983 you were issued an other than
honorable discharge.

and your contention that

However,

the Board found the evidence and

post service conduct,

in its review of your entire record and application,

The Board,
carefully considered all mitigating factors, such as your youth
and immaturity,
because your request for leave was denied, you became an
unauthorized absentee.
materials submitted were not sufficient to warrant
recharacterization of your discharge given the serious offense of
desertion which resulted in your request for discharge to avoid
trial.
extended to you when your request for discharge to avoid trial by
court-martial was approved since, by this action, you escaped the
possibility of confinement at hard labor and a punitive
discharge.
benefit of your bargain with the Marine Corps when your request
for discharge was granted and you should not be permitted to
change it now.

The Board believed that considerable clemency was

the Board concluded that you received the

Accordingly,

your application has been denied.

Further,

The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard,
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently,
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

when applying for a correction of an official naval

it is important to keep in mind that a

You are entitled to have the

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07430-97

    Original file (07430-97.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 April 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09145-06

    Original file (09145-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 1 June 1972. On 11 October 1974 you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00387-06

    Original file (00387-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 19 February 1976. Although the request...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04176-01

    Original file (04176-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. While the request is not in your record, it is presumed that you submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order It is to avoid trial by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05999-01

    Original file (05999-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 28 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge to avoid trial for an unauthorized absence of nearly 40 months and your prior unauthorized absences of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04395-02

    Original file (04395-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The Board found that your request was granted on 8 On 5 July 1977 your discharge was upgraded to general under the provisions of the Special Discharge Review...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03580-02

    Original file (03580-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted Your allegations of error and your naval record and applicable statutes, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06661-07

    Original file (06661-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material -error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 25 May 1969 at age 18. On 14 March 1971 you escaped from...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06568-02

    Original file (06568-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor forfeitures of $50 per month for three months, On 31 January 1970, the convening Your record further reflects you were an unauthorized absentee from 5 March 1970 to 2...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06805-05

    Original file (06805-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your military record shows that you submitted a written request for a discharge under other than honorable conditions in order to avoid trial by court-martial for the two periods of unauthorized’ absence totaling about 720 days and the period of desertion totaling about 4193 days. You were...