DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TRG
Docket No: 1565-01
19 July 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 17 July 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
On 12 January 2000 a Navy drug laboratory reported
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 29 December 1999
at age 18.
that the urinalysis showed that you had tested positive for
marijuana.
for an administrative separation.
processing, you elected to waive your procedural rights.
January 2000 the separation authority directed an entry level
separation and the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code.
were so separated on 24 January 2001.
Based on the positive urinalysis you were processed
In connection with this
On 19
You
Regulations require the assignment of an
RX-4 reenlistment code
when an individual is separated by reason of erroneous enlistment
due to drug abuse.
Since you have been treated no differently
than others separated for that reason, the Board could not find
an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4
code.
reenlistment
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
The names and
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case
are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04441-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 12 January 2001 Subsequently, At the time The Board thus concluded that there is no error or The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of drugs. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00069-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2001. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3J reenlistment code when an individual in an entry level status tests positive for marijuana use, served less than 30 days in the DEP, confessed to the use of marijuana during the moment of truth, and was processed for separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05181-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. At that time you were On 12 June 2000 the Subsequently,, on 16 The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of drugs. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01284-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 8 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. as evidenced by the positive You were advised of and waived all of and you were assigned an RE-4 On 17 May 2000 you the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code Regulations require to an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00967-01
be separated and requested retention in the Navy. On 22 September 2000 the separation authority directed an entry level separation and you were so separated on that same day. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01744-01
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 19 April 2000 at age 19. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in the reason for discharge, given your drug use prior to your enlistment in the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06262-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 September 2001. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of drugs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02781-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 18 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06264-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 September 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06218-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board concluded that these factors such as your youth and The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of drugs. Consequently, when applying...