DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 7242-00
23 March 2001
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 March 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 22
August 1985 at age 18.
1986.
punishments.
appointed place of duty.
The record reflects that you received two nonjudicial
The offenses included forgery and absence from your
You reported to active duty on 23 June
On 30 November 1987 the commanding officer recommended that you
be separated with a general discharge by reason of misconduct due
to commission of a serious offense.
discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was
approved and you were discharged with a general discharge by
reason of misconduct on 14' January
assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.
After review by the
1988.
At that time you were
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
immaturity.
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge,
given your record of two nonjudicial punishments.
However, the Board concluded that these factors were
Therefore, the
Board concluded that no change to the discharge is warranted.
Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4
reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of
misconduct.
the Board could not find an error or
others in your situation,
injustice in the assignment of your reenlistment code.
Since you have been treated no differently than
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02132-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00651-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 January 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and you received a general discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse on 9 January 1989. In its review of your application...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07637-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11024-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 28 July 1993 at age 21 and extended this period of enlistment on 1 August...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03690-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that as a result of your prior period of honorable service, you may be eligible for veterans' benefits.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12456-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Branch (MMER/RE), a copy of which is attached. Subsequently, on 23 January 2001, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05897-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02870-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ,application on 11 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. given the two nonjudicial Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07564-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01676-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 CRS Docket No: 1676-01 15 January 2002 Your allegations of error and Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 January 2002. injustice were reviewed...