DEPARTMENT OF THE
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
NAVY-
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
CRS
Docket No: 2132-01
19 July 2001
Your allegations of error and
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 18 July 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 19 November 1985
at age 24.
nonjudicial punishments.
duty, insubordination on three occasions, disrespect on two
occasions, an unspecified violation of Article 92 of the Uniform
Code of Military Justice and an unauthorized absence.
On 21 June 1989 the commanding officer recommended that you be
separated with an other than honorable discharge by reason of
misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and commission of a
serious offense.
elected to waive the right to present your case to an
Subsequently, you received a
administrative discharge board.
fourth nonjudicial punishment for willfully disobeying a superior
commissioned officer, disrespect, and use of provoking speech.
After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for
separation was approved and on 4 August 1989 you were discharged
with an other than honorable discharge by reason of a pattern of
misconduct.
At that time you were assigned a reenlistment code
Your record reflects that you received three
The offenses included dereliction of
When informed of the recommendation, you
However, the Board concluded that these factors were
of RE-4.
On 17 October 1990 the Naval Discharge Review Board changed the
characterization of your service to general.
for separation, misconduct, was not changed.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
immaturity.
not sufficient to warrant further recharacterization of your
discharge, given your record of four nonjudicial punishments.
Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4
reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of
Since you have been treated no differently than
misconduct.
others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or
injustice in the assignment of your reenlistment code.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
However, the reason
The names and
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06828-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2010. , On 1 January 1990 you were referred for an evaluation due to alcohol abuse and assigned to a Level iII rehabilitation program. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06828-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2010. , On 1 January 1990 you were referred for an evaluation due to alcohol abuse and assigned to a Level iII rehabilitation program. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08555-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 July 2007. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01379-01
The NDRB essentially found that given the nature Discharge Review Board of your offenses and your excellent post service conduct, a discharge under other than honorable conditions was no longer appropriate. such as your youth and desire for However, the Board Concerning your request for a change in the reenlistment code, the Board noted that regulations require the assignment of an 4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08244-98
On 5 September 1989 you were diagnosed with a severe borderline personality disorder which existed prior to enlistment (EPTE) and alcohol abuse. Further, the Board noted that even though you had been warned of Given an administrative separation, the Board concluded that your all the circumstances of your case, discharge, narrative reason for separation, and reenlistment code were proper and no change is warranted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04558-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 4 November 1988. On 27 April 1989 you received a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11971-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After consulting with legal counsel, you elected to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04924-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction, of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2009. You underwent a pre-separation physical assessment on 21 May 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden ig on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09972-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 9 February 1989 at age 20 and reported for three years of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05432-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...