DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
NAVY
ANNEX
2
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
S
JRE
Docket No: 6879-02
2 December
2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting
session, considered your application on 21 November 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board
in executive
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that you were discharged from the Navy on 3 January 1986, without
entitlement to disability benefits, after it was determined that your injuries were incurred as a
result of your own misconduct, specifically as a result of your operation of a motorcycle at an
Following your discharge, officials of the Department of
unsafe speed while intoxicated.
Veterans Affairs conducted an independent review of the circumstances of the incurrence of
your injuries, and denied your request for service connection for the residuals of your
injuries.
The Board did not accept your unsubstantiated contention to the effect that the accident
occurred when a bag of ice was thrown at you by several
you had been dancing with a woman whom they presumably felt you should not
dancing with.
in the line of duty, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
panel will be furnished upon request.
have been
In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your injuries were incurred
The names and votes of the members of the
“Skin Heads”, who were upset that
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02115-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. entitlement to di that you had conceale In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were unfit for duty due to physical disability that was aggravated by your naval service, the Board was unable to recommend corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04012-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The PEB made preliminary findings that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability incurred as a result of your own misconduct, and therefore not ratable. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04341-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08519-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 August 2002. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07328-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive 10 October 2002. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your discharge by reason of misconduct was erroneous or unjust, and establishes that your condition was incurred in the line of duty, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07459-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive Your allegations of error and session, considered your application on 22 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance applicable to the proceedings of this Board, consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board rejected your contention to the effect that the absence of documents...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09993-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. and denied your claim for Although the Board was sympathetic to your situation, it was unable to conclude that you did not jump out a police wagon as alleged, or that your injuries were incurred in the line of duty, and not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03461-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive oti 22 August 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06840-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21September 2006. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04460-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 20 June 1969. evaluated by a medical board on 26 September 1969, and given a diagnosis of You disclosed to the medical board that you had suffered a crushing injury to ; years...