DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
'2 NAVY ANNEX JRE
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100, © Docket No. 02115-0939
23 November 2009
BOARD FOR
n reference to your application for correction of your
he provisions of title 10 of the
section 1552.
“This is i
naval record pursuant to t
United States Code,
panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
session, considered your
Your allegations of error and
dance with administrative
A three-member
Records, sitting in executive
application on 16: October 2009.
injustice were reviewed in accor
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
Lentious consideration of the ent
submitted was
bable material
ire
2 April 1981 without
sability benefits due to a psychotic disorder
d in order to procure your enlistment.
Following your discharge, the Department of Veterans Affairs
independently determined that your mental disorder was not
incurred in or aggravated by your naval service.
entitlement to di
that you had conceale
In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were
unfit for duty due to physical disability that was aggravated by
your naval service, the Board was unable to recommend corrective
action in your case. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03667-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05359-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that you served on active duty in the Marine Corps from 11 December 1974 to 15 July 1975, when you were discharged by reason of unsuitability due to a personality disorder, a condition that is not considered to be a disability under the laws administered by the Department of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10883-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that the mental disorder that caused you to be discharged by reason of physical disability was incurred in or aggravated by your period of naval service, the Board was unable to recommend favorable action on your request. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07689-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2009. It concluded that your receipt of disability ratings and a non- service connected pension more than thirty years after you were discharged from the Navy is not probative of your contention that you should have been separated or retired by reason of - physical disability in 1970.Accordingly, your application has been denied. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05634-08
AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09447-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2010. The fact that the VA granted you a disability rating approximately twenty years after you were discharged from the Navy is not probative of the existence of error or injustice in your naval record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00055-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11037-08
As a result of that rating action, your case was referred to the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery for review. After being advised of the options available.to you, you elected to request transfer to the Retired List of the Marine Corps Reserve with entitlement to retired pay at age 60. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06208-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval, Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03779-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...