Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06804-02
Original file (06804-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

S

JRE
Docket No: 6804-02
14 November 2002

: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

From 
To:

Secretary of the Navy

Subj 

:

FORMER
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref: (a)

10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl:

(1)
(2)

DD Form 149
Subject’s naval record

1.
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect,
show that she was assigned a reenlistment code of RE-1

hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
that her naval record be corrected to
vice RE-4.

2. The Board, consisting of Ms.  
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 September 2002 and, pursuant to its
regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

Moidel and Messrs. Bishop and Geisler reviewed

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice finds as follows:

’s allegations

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.

c.

Petitioner served on active duty in the Navy from 9 February to 29 March 1999,
when she was discharged by reason of erroneous entry because of a disqualifying mental
disorder which existed prior to he enlistment.
as permitted by governing directives.

She was assigned a reenlistment code of  

RE-4,

d. Petitioner contends, in effect, that prior to enlisting, she disclosed the condition

which resulted in her discharge, but failed to obtain a waiver because she was not told that
one was required.
she had not obtained a waiver, and that she decided to accept discharge and then pursue a
waiver. Unfortunately, the reenlistment code she was assigned is generally not waivable.

She did not contest her discharge because she felt it would be fruitless, as

In support of her application, she submitted a statement from a Navy recruiter, which is
the effect that he believes Petitioner is  “very dedicated, mature and hard charging ”, and
would be a positive asset to the Navy ”. He recommended that her request be granted.

to

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that it
would be in the interest of justice to correct Petitioner ’s record to show that she was assigned
a reenlistment code of  
disqualification from reenlistment.

RE-3E, which would permit her to apply for a waiver of her physical

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that she was assigned a

RE-3E, vice the code of RE-4 she was actually assigned on 29 March

reenlistment code of  
1999. 

.

b. That so much of Petitioner ’s request for correction of her naval record as exceeds

the foregoing be denied.

C. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner

’s naval record.

4.
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

/EL+

5.
Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of
the Board for correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing
corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board
on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03031-01

    Original file (03031-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that she was assigned a reenlistment (RE) code more favorable than the RE-4 she received on 2 March 1999. d. SECNAVINST 1900.8 provides, in effect, that Sailors discharged for failing to meet procurement medical/physical standards will be assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4. CONCLUSION: Upon...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06784-02

    Original file (06784-02.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that she received a reenlistment code of RE-i, vice the RE-4 code she actually received on 13 September 2000. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that she was assigned a reenlistment code of RE-3, vice the code of RE-4 she actually received. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9807325

    Original file (NC9807325.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 7325-98 16 July 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF 4% Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her reenlistment code be changed. Based on the doctors...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Sep 21 09_16_49 CDT 2000

    c. age 20. doctor notes that “this condition was not correctable to meet Navy standards” and recommended administrative separation. Therefore, the Board concludes that the RE-4 Additionally, there is no However, the Board This code will alert recruiters that 2 The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner’s naval record so that all future reviewers will be aware of the diagnosis of asthma and understand the reason for the change in the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04752-07

    Original file (04752-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board, requesting a change in her RE-4 reenlistment code and reason for discharge (“Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards”)- 2. She was discharged with an entry level separation, assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code, and a JFW separation code on 9 March 2006.f. That a copy of this report of proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.c.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05143-03

    Original file (05143-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 5 April 2001. c. On 12 February 2001 a grand jury charged Petitioner with robbery and a warrant was issued for her arrest. Applicable directives authorize the assignment of either an RE-3E or RE-4 reenlistment code to an individual separated for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01905-10

    Original file (01905-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS NAVY ANNEX e JRE WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 1) et No. 1905-10 25 March 20106 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: FORMER SR,

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06862-02

    Original file (06862-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (I) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that she was discharged by reason of Secretarial Authority, and assigned a reenlistment code of RE-1. Contrary to counsel noted to have pes planus during examinations conducted both before and after she enlisted. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07640-98

    Original file (07640-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Y DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAW ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No: 7640-98 30 April 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy L REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a reenlistment code of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02126-01

    Original file (02126-01.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Naval Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 18 March 1998. Accordingly, the Board recommends that Petitioner’s reason for separation be changed to erroneous enlistment vice personality disorder. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that she received an entry level...