Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06538-99
Original file (06538-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Y

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON, D.C. 203704100

SMC
Docket No: 06538-99
20 December 2000

SSGT

SMC

Dear Staff S

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 20 December 2000. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review
Board 

(PERB), dated 8 November 2000, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the report of the PERB.
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

In view of the above, your application has been denied. The

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
taken. You are entitled to have the 
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official

records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
  STATES MARINE

HEADQUARTERS UNITED

  CORP S

3280  RUSSELL ROAD
VlRGlNlA  22 

QUANTICO,  

134-5 103

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

Ref:

MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB)

N IN THE CASE OF STAFF
USMC

(b) 

MC0 

Pl610.7D 

DD Form 149 of 3 
w/Ch 1-4

Ott 99

Per 

MC0 

1610.11C, the Performance Evaluation Review Board,
met on 7 November 2000 to consider

1.
with three members present,
Staff 
Removal of the fitness report for the period 971003 to 971105
(ITD) was requested.
directive governing submission of the report.

tition contained in reference (a).

Reference (b) is the performance evaluation

Sergea

The petitioner infers that since he successfully completed

2.
the Staff Noncommissioned Officer Career Course in December 1998,
the challenged fitness report should be expunged.

In its proceedings,

The petitioner is certainly to be commended

the PERB concluded that the report is

3.
both administratively correct and procedurally complete as
written and filed.
on his perseverance in returning to the Staff Noncommissioned
Officers Academy and graduating from the Career Course.
the fact remains that he was previously disenrolled from that
formal course of instruction and the occurrence was correctly
reported per the provisions of reference (b).
Board discerns neither an error nor an injustice.

To this end, the

However,

The Board's opinion,

4.
vote, is that the contested fitness report should remain a part
of Staff 

based on deliberation and secret ballot

ficial military record.

Sergean

Subj:

MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB)
ADVISORY
SERGEANT,

N IN THE CASE OF STAFF
USMC

5

V.

The case is forwarded for final action.

Chairperson, Performance
Evaluation Review Board
Personnel Management Division
Manpower and Reserve Affairs
Department
By direction of the Commandant
of the Marine Corps



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04998-00

    Original file (04998-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280RUSSELL ROA D QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22 134-5 103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 161 0 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: Ref: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF STAFF USMC SERGEAN (a) (b) SSgt. VIRGINIA 22134-5103 NAVY IN REPLY REFER TO: 107 0 .MI MEMORANDUM FOR...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05305-01

    Original file (05305-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 2 July 2001, and the memorandum for the record dated 2 August 2001, copies of which are attached. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02641-00

    Original file (02641-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The following comments concerning the page 11 entry dated 960112 4. are provided: a. The following comments concerning the page 11 entry dated 980326 5. are provided:' a. he was he statement would be filed acknowledged the counseling " to" make a statement in Again, it is noted that a copy of the rebuttal statement Sergean furthe b. Sergean does not provide documented evidence to support his claim that the page 11 entry is in error or unjust.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06881-99

    Original file (06881-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    They were unable to find how, if at all, his report influenced your nonjudicial punishment or your removal from the 1998 staff sergeant selection list, nor could they find how he changed his opinions following the review of his report by the CO. We reviewed Sergeant documents concerning his Administrative Remarks page 11 entries dated 980804 and 981125, Offenses and Punishment page 12 entry dated 990311 and CMC letter 1450/3 MMPR-2 dated 2. In view of the above, it is recommended...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02497-00

    Original file (02497-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DErARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07849-00

    Original file (07849-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board 2000, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. plagiarize the work of another student while at the Staff Noncommissioned Officers Academy (SNCO Academy), and that his disenrollment was unwarranted.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01886-00

    Original file (01886-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Removal of the following fitness reports was requested: a. b. The case is forwarded for fin Colonel, U.S. Marine Corps Deputy Director Personnel Management Division Manpower and Reserve Affairs Department By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps 2 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-510 3 IN REPLY REFER TO: 5354 MPE ---, .i MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE NAVAL RECORDS DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF Subj: REVIEW...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04367-00

    Original file (04367-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. JUIi MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: Ref: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINI GUNNERY SERGE E OF USMC (a) (b) (c) GySg MC0 MC0 P1610.7C Form 149 of 10 Apr 00 l-4 w/Ch 1-5 Per MC0 1610.11C, the Performance Evaluation Review...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06467-98

    Original file (06467-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director I Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY htdKIUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON, D.C....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04805-00

    Original file (04805-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 10 July 2000, a copy of which is attached. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...