DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 5763-00
5 April 2001
Dear
This is in reference to your
naval record pursuant to the
States Code, Section 1552.
application for correction of your
provisions of Title 10, United
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
'Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 3 April 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 4 March 1959
after prior active service of two years.
that you received five nonjudicial punishments and were convicted
by three summary courts-martial.
unauthorized absences of more than four days, sleeping on watch,
absence from your appointed place of duty, insubordination,,
resisting apprehension,
failure to obey a lawful order, and
disrespect.
The offenses included
The record reflects
On 22 October 1964 an administrative discharge board recommended
that you be separated with an undesirable discharge by reason of
unfitness.
recommendation for separation was approved and you were
discharged with an undesirable discharge on 25 November 1964.
After review by the discharge authority, the
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
and good postservice conduct.
these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization
However, the Board concluded that
such as your youth and immaturity
of your discharge, given your record of frequent involvement with
military authorities.
you were the subject of eight disciplinary actions within a
period of less than six years.
concluded that no change to the discharge is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board especially noted the fact that
Based on the foregoing, the Board
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09551-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Contained in your record is a signed probation until May 1965. and witnessed statement, dated 15 June 1964, that states as follows: disrespect and five...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08213-00
your second request on 22 August 1966. Since you You were advised of your _ An enlisted performance evaluation board was convened in the Bureau of Naval Personnel on 23 March 1967 and recommended an undesirable discharge by reason of misconduct due to civil conviction. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05999-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 28 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge to avoid trial for an unauthorized absence of nearly 40 months and your prior unauthorized absences of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04902-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your misconduct that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12977-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07927-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 3 April 1961 at age 17. On 10 February 1965 an ADB recommended an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05654-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.Lou enlisted in he Navy on 14 August 1962 at age 18. On 18 February 1965 you submitted a written...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02003-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge, given the seriousness of the civil conviction and your four nonjudicial punishments. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08397-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2001. During the period from 16 March to 1 September 1965 you received NJP on four more occasions for two periods of unauthorized absence (UA) totalling 11 days, disobedience, wrongful possession of an altered identification card, two periods of absence from your appointed place of duty, and sleeping on watch. Subsequently, the discharge authority directed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00918-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. received NJP for misbehavior as sentinel, failure to go to your appointed place of duty, punishment imposed was restriction and extra duty for 45 days and a $45 forfeiture of pay. On 13 June 1965 your commanding officer...