Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05585-02
Original file (05585-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
S

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 5585-02
11 September 2002

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
ANNEX

NAVY 

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

From:
To:

Subj:

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref:

(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl:

(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Series of Documents
(3) Subject ’s naval record

1.
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show advanced when first eligible.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs.
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 September 2002 and, pursuant to its
regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

McPartlin, Pfeiffer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed

 

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice, finds as follows:

’s allegations

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

Petitioner was given Non-Judicial Punishment (NJP) on 5 March 2001 by the

Commanding Officer of the USS Rhode Island which reduced the Petitioner to
Petitioner reported to COMSUBGRU 10 for duty 6 March 2001 and appealed the NJP to the
Commanding Officer of COMSUBGRU 10 who then suspended the reduction in grade for six
months. A substitute exam for advancement to  
the Exam in April 2001 and was a selectee.

paygrade E-6 was ordered and Petitioner took

paygrade E-4.

 

C.

In July 2001 the CO of the USS Rhode Island wrote an evaluation on the Petitioner

which ended on 5 March 2001 and withdrew his recommendation for promotion. The
Petitioner received an evaluation for the period 6 March 2001 to 5 March 2002 giving him a
4.0 and recommended him for promotion.

Docket No: 3072-02

d. After reviewing the correspondence attached as enclosure  

that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.

(2), the Board concluded

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the
contents of enclosure  
following corrective action.

(2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

a.

Petitioner was advanced to  

paygrade E-6 effective 16 December 2001.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner

’s naval record.

4.
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

YSL-LG. L. ADAMS

Acting Recorder

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of

5.
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions,
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

it is hereby announced that the

11 September 2002



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06639-02

    Original file (06639-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner earned Pass Not Advanced 2001 Exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Harrison, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00997-02

    Original file (00997-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mackey, Pauling, and Ms. McCorniick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an i~ijustice warranting the following corrective action. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05810-01

    Original file (05810-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to receive credit for nine (9) days travel time when she traveled her last ship, USS Port Royal, homeported in Pearl Harbor, to New Port, Rhode Island for separation processing. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Pfeiffer, and Taylor, reviewed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08035-01

    Original file (08035-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Novello, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01112-03

    Original file (01112-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08049-02

    Original file (08049-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N OF NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 MEH :ddj Docket No: 8049-02 17 December 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07973-01

    Original file (07973-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced to paygrade E-4 effective 16 September 200 1. allega\.ions of error and 2. (2), the Board finds the existence of an and especially in light of the iI?justice warranting the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: Docket No:...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06612-02

    Original file (06612-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. and especially in light of injustice warranting the the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, ;o show that: Docket No: 6612-02 a. Petitioner was advanced to paygrade E-3 effective 6 August 2001 and further corrected to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02115-02

    Original file (02115-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N OF NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 2 1 15-02 3 April 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McPartlin, Pauling, and Harrison, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 26 March 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06327-02

    Original file (06327-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 6327-02 3 September 2002 From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (4 (1) (2) (3) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 DD Form 149 w/attachments Series of Documents Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this...