Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05475-01
Original file (05475-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

TRG
Docket No:   5475-01
10 May   2002

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF

(a) Title 10 U.S.C.   1552

(1) Case Summary
(2) Subject's naval record

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an
1.
enlisted member of the Navy filed an application with this Board
requesting that her record be corrected by removing the
nonjudicial punishment (NJP) of 23 April 1998 from her record.

The Board, consisting of Mr. Cooper, Mr. Bishop and Mr.

2 .
Milner, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 30 April 1992 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
Documentary material considered by
available evidence of record.
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining

3 .
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:

a.

Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

Petitioner's application was filed in a timely manner.

C .

Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 28 January 1997 for

She received NJP on 23 April 1998 for failing to go

making false official statements,
The punishment imposed was 60 days restriction,

four years.
to her appointed place of duty,
and malingering.
forfeitures of $544 pay, and a suspended reduction in rate from
On 9 October
seaman (SN; E-3) to seaman apprentice (SA; E-2).
1998 the suspension was vacated due to continuing misconduct and
she was reduced to SA.
officer set aside the vacation action and restored her to SN.
"A" school, been advanced
Since the  
in rate on several occasions and, on 2 March 2001, reenlisted for
four years.

On 14 December 1998, the commanding

NJP,- she had graduated from  

d.

In her application, Petitioner requests removal of

entries on her Enlisted Qualifications History (page 4)
concerning her promotion history and the entry showing that she
received NJP "due to vacation of charges".
matter, the advancement regulations state that when a reduction
in rate is set aside, it should be treated as if the reduction
never occurred.

Concerning this

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants partial
favorable action.
There is no evidence in the record, and
Petitioner has submitted none,
officer intended to set aside the entire NJP.
reduction in rate was set aside,
remaining.
not be removed from the record.

Therefore, the Board concludes that the NJP should

to indicate that the commanding

there is still punishment

Although the

Since the commanding officer set aside the reduction in rate, the
Board concludes that all evidence of the vacation of the
suspension and the setting aside of the vacation action should be
removed from her record.

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing all

a.
evidence that she was reduced in rate on 13 October 1998 and that
this reduction was set aside on 14 December 1998.
Such action
should include but not be limited to the following:

(1) the removal of the court memoranda  

October and 14 December 1998; and

(P601-7R) dated 13

(2) removal of the entries from the promotion history on the

page 4 so it will indicate that she was never reduced.

That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to

b.
the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

C . That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's
naval record be returned to the Board,
of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file maintained
for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of
Petitioner's naval record.

together with this Report

That Petitioner's request for removal of the NJP from the

C .
record be denied.

2

It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's

4.
and that the foregoing is a true and
review and deliberations,
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

Q. 7 
E. GOLDSMITH

jL

Acting Recorder

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

5.
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a),
has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

-2
+%_W.

.*DEAN P EIFFER

Executive Director

3



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05659-08

    Original file (05659-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 5659-08 26 August 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: <

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07313-05

    Original file (07313-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that a summary court-martial be removed from his record or, in the alternative, that the court-martial sentence be reduced.2. Petitioner has been informed that the Board is prevented by law from reviewing courts-martial and must limit its review to determining if the sentence should be reduced as a matter of clemency.CONCLUSION:Upon review and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00256-02

    Original file (00256-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an 1. enlistment member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected by expunging all references to the nonjudicial punishment (NJP) of 3 May 2000. \\reduction to next inferior pay grade,, should be Since there is a remaining punishment, the Board However, Concerning the performance evaluation, the Board believes...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07959-05

    Original file (07959-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge and reason for discharge than the general discharge by reason of misconduct issued on 25 November 1998. Additionally, he requests that his reentry code of RE-4 be changed and that his records be corrected to show that he was a seaman (SN; E-3) at the time of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06307-05

    Original file (06307-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    CONFINEMENT ORDERED FROM (YYMMMDD( 40 CHANGE E1~OS TO (YYMMMDCi~ 8. REPORT OF ACTION [1 1). In view of the member’s reduction in rate being set aside we recommend the following be deleted from block- 43 of the report in question: “Evaluation submitted due to member’s reduction in rate”.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04687-98

    Original file (04687-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEP,ARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 4687-98 15 April 1999 From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF 1(1-__~ (a) Title 10 'U.S.C. the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. RMSN (E- d. Petitioner states in his application that when the command advanced him to RM3, this...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04659-08

    Original file (04659-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting that her naval record be corrected by setting-aside the nonjudicial punishment (NJP) she received on 24 July 2006 and advancing her to HM3 with time in rate credit for promotion to HM2. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable action. The Board believes that this is a matter which should be reviewed by her...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02895-06

    Original file (02895-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 203705100 TRGDocket No: 2895-061 November 2006From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OFRef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual completes an extended period of active duty and is serving in pay grade E-2. Since he was recommended for advancement and retention in his last...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05582-01

    Original file (05582-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an 1. enlisted member of the Navy filed an application with this Board requesting that his record-be corrected-to reduction in rate, imposed at the 17 March punishment show that the 1997 nonjudicial (NJP) was suspended. 2 f. Petitioner initially applied to the Board in 2000 requesting his original effective date and TIR for, application, he contended that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015353

    Original file (20080015353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. The new battalion commander used the above incident to vacate the applicant's suspended reduction in rank and grade by the former battalion commander, claiming the applicant was willfully derelict in her duties by failing to properly research and notify the chain of command of a Red Cross message. On 29 August 2007, the suspended punishment was vacated for violating Article 92, UCMJ, dereliction in the performance of her duties by willfully failing to properly research and notify the...