DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
WMP
Docket No:
6 December 2002
5222-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 December 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 2 June 1993 at
age 20.
cocaine during the "moment of truth" at recruit training.
On 3 June 1993 you admitted to pre-service use of
On 3 June 1993 you were notified that separation action was
being initiated by reason of defective enlistment and induction
due to erroneous enlistment as evidenced by your use of cocaine.
You were advised of and waived all of your procedural rights and
did not object to the proposed separation.
separation was approved,
uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of erroneous
entry due to drug abuse.
At that time, you were assigned an
4 reenlistment code.
On 8 June 1993
and on 9 June 1993 you received an
RE-
Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
to an individual separated by reason of erroneous enlistment due
to drug abuse.
properly assigned since you were appropriately separated due to
your admission of pre-service drug use.
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Therefore, the RE-4 reenlistment code was
The names and votes of the members
Accordingly, your
You are entitled to have
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently,
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
when applying for a correction of an official
it is important to keep in mind that
In this regard,
Sincerely,
w. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05463-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 29010. The Board concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code, and that you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more favorable code as an exception to policy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08181-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Since you have been treated no differently than others separated under similar circumstances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01284-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 8 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. as evidenced by the positive You were advised of and waived all of and you were assigned an RE-4 On 17 May 2000 you the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code Regulations require to an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01703-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 15 September 2000 you received an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of erroneous entry due to drug abuse, and you were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07224-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2003. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00977-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08208-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01715-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 19 November 1993 at age 18 and reported for active duty on 24...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12641-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00823-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 November 2009. of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 2 August 1999, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of erroneous entry, drug abuse.