DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JRE
Docket No: 6336-01
7 January 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 3 January 2002.
Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Boars
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy on 6 November 1959. You received
nonjudicial punishment on five occasions, and were convicted by summary and special
courts-martial. On 6 November 1963, your commanding officer decided to recommend that
you be discharged by reason of unsuitability, based on your diagnosis of a paranoid
personality disorder, vice by reason of unfitness based on your extensive disciplinary record.
The recommendation was approved by the Chief of Naval Personnel on 22 November 1963.
You were discharged by reason of unsuitability on 18 December 1963, in grade E-3, with a
general discharge.
The Board was not persuaded that the diagnosis which resulted in your discharge was
erroneous, that you suffered from a bipolar disorder at that time, or that you were unfit for
duty by reason of physical disability.
characterized with a general discharge, in view of your disciplinary record and your failure
to achieve the minimum conduct mark average to qualify for an honorable discharge.
It concluded that your service was properly
It
could find no basis for excusing your misconduct, or for recommending that your discharge
be upgraded to honorable, or that your former grade of E-5 be restored.
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
Accordingly, your
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05283-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, -when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07469-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your _ application on 1 April 2010. On 28 September 2009, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) denied your request for service connection for posttraumatic stress disorder, after determining that the disorder was not related to your military service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07469-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your _ application on 1 April 2010. On 28 September 2009, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) denied your request for service connection for posttraumatic stress disorder, after determining that the disorder was not related to your military service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00485-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07039-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. conducted on 22 January 1965, diagnosed you with a personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 09388-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 2 July 2001. You were discharged by reason of a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02012-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October 2002. You were discharged by reason of unsuitability/personality disorder on 19 October 1979. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05793-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02786-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 17 June 2002 at age 17 and served without disciplinary incident.On 2 March...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05066-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, it is Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...