Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04988-02
Original file (04988-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 4988-02
24 September 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section

1552.

 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 24 September 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorrandum 1780 Pers-604 27 August 2002, a copy of which is
attached.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

  The names and votes of

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

MILLINGTON T

N 38055-000 0

178 0
PERS-604
27 Aug 02

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Sub

Ref:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

IONS ICO

(a) CNPC memo  5420 PERS-OOZCB of 26 Aug 02
(b) Title 38,

United States Code, Chapter 34

1.

The following is provided in response to reference (a):

a.

When

tates he was promised a 

"VA benefit

for enlistment in the Navy,

package"
to loan guaranty 
the letter from the Department of Veterans Affairs,  

benefits,.not  education benefits.

As stated in
which-.
he did not serve enough time to

it appears he is referring

-included in his petition
be considered a veteran.

,

b.

Regarding education  

benefits,- entered active
Per reference (b), the education

To establish eligibility for the VEGIB Program,

duty on 23 December 1976.
benefit program at that time was the Vietnam Era GI Bill (VEGIB)
Program.
members must have served 181 or more continuous days of active
f
duty.
he was not eligible for VEGIB Program'benefits.
active duty,
even if he had been eligible, opportunity to use
Additionally,
VEGIB Program benefits ended 31 December 1989.

Since-did not serve 181 continuous,days o

2.

PERS-604's point of contact is Ms.

who can be

Branch (PERS-604)

,



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06617-01

    Original file (06617-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    application, together with applicable statutes, opinion attached. The program when he entered active duty (other than ember 1977 was the Veterans Educational Recommend in an educational education benefit entry onto active available to for training) Assistance Program to members who entered the military for the first time between 1 January 1977 and 30 June 1985. enrollments on 30 June 1985, 28 October 1986 to 31 March 1987. before these deadlines lost their eligibility. b. states he was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05531-00

    Original file (05531-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Opportunity to draw education benefits from the VEGIB Program ended on 31 December 1989. b. VEGIB Program members who were on active duty any time between 19 October 1984 and 1 July 1985 and served continuously from that date through 30 June 1988, followed by four years in the Selected Reserves, had their remaining entitlement converted to Montgomery...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06007-03

    Original file (06007-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by PERS memorandum 1780 PERS-604 of 15 July 2003, a copy of which is attached. record requires no correction since he was Program benefits. A t this time, it's a moot point since MIA cannot make payments under the VEOIB Program for training pursued after 31 D e 1989. c e d. Per referenae (d), VEQIB Program eligibles meeting either of the following requirements are automatically converted the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06603-02

    Original file (06603-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opening a VEAP account prior to the legislated deadlines, he is not eligible for VEAP benefits or conversion to the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05347-02

    Original file (05347-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (b) the decision to enroll/disenroll in the MGIB Program is irrevocable.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05492-02

    Original file (05492-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers 604 of 23 August 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03684-02

    Original file (03684-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. (b), VEAP was closed to new enrollments on Members 'who did not enroll before these request to enroll (VEAP).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02460-02

    Original file (02460-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Board. Program record accordingly. PERS-604 has corrected This was apparently an erroneous entry He may have received this information ce, Denver has for MGIB Program electronic MGIB money was collected for Accoun fro c. W declined enrollment in the MGIB Program in writing on 29 March 1991 and no money was collected for enrollment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08083-01

    Original file (08083-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 J LP: yrj Docket No: X083-0 9 July 2002 1 panel A three-member session, considered your were reviewed in proceedings of‘ this Board. application, together with all applicable statutes. regulations opinion furnished NI’C attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01712-02

    Original file (01712-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Eligibility for federal education benefit programs is determined by the member's initial entrance onto active duty other than for training. without enrollment in the MGIB Program, would have no education benefits.