DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
NAVY
ANNEX
2
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
S
CRS
Docket No: 4280-02
15 August 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 14 August 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and
procedures.applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 23 September
1981 at age 19.
nonjudicial punishments.
Sailor in escaping from confinement, larceny, housebreaking,
receiving stolen property, use of marijuana, and an assault upon
your wife.
The record reflects that you received four
The offenses included assisting another
On 15 January 1986 an administrative discharge board recommended
that you be separated with an other than honorable discharge by
reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense.
After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for
separation was approved and you were discharged on 27 February
1986 with an other than honorable discharge.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
and the contention that the first four years of your service were
However, the Board concluded that these factors were
honorable.
such as your youth and immaturity
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge,
In this
given the frequency and seriousness of the offenses.
regard, you had three disciplinary actions during your first four
years.
discharge is warranted.
denied.
furnished upon request.
Accordingly, your application has been
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
Therefore, the Board concluded that no change to the
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05144-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 4 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The punishment imposed was forfeitures of $100 per month On 30 January 1986 The Your record further shows that you received NJP for 21 days of unauthorized absence from 4 to 25 March 1986 and missing ship's movement. 1986 NMPC approved...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04041-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together.with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10129-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 22 September 1986, you again received NUP for wrongful use of cocaine.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02305-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The CO of the DETROIT responded that when you reported on board the RTC letter of 2 June 1986 was noted in your service record, but the ship was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08336-07
The offenses you committed which resulted in this sentence are not stated. The Board found that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your multiple instances of misconduct while in the Navy. There is no evidence in your Navy record and you have submitted none to show that you were mentally ill while in the Navy or if you were that it was sufficient to mitigate your misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06487-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07945-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 25 September 1986 the discharge authority approved these recommendations and directed an other than honorable discharge, and on 2 October 1986, you were so separated. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05398-01
Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 3 October 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were so discharged on 28 May...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09332-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and Conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or in] ustice.On 28 January 1983 you enlisted in the Navy at age 21. During the period from 21 February 1984 to 22...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04861-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were sentenced to 30 days of confinement at hard labor and a forfeiture of $426. other than honorable discharge was appropriate, based on your NJP and court martial conviction.