DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No:
7 October 2002
4238-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 2 October 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together'with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
On 29 September 1965 a speed letter listed you as a
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 29 June
1964.
battle Vietnam casualty.
a superficial gunshot wound to the left side of your neck and
left shoulder, inflicted by another Marine, when you failed to
answer a challenge while on patrol.
Your parents received the
same information on 4 October 1965 by casualty message.
On 28
June 1967 you were honorably separated and transferred to the
Marine Corps Reserve.
non-
The letter stated that you had received
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
such as your contention that you
did not fail to answer a challenge and your request to remove
these two items from your record.
that you provided no evidence why the record is incorrect.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
However, the Board concluded
The names and
.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05178-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the letter furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) dated 25 September 2003, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10020-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the letter furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC), dated 13 December 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03664-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your reenlistment code was assigned based on your overall record of performance while on active duty and means that you were not eligible for reenlistment at the time of separation and the disqualifying factor is not covered by another reenlistment code or the code was directed by the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03392-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. The members of the chain of command were present, made statements and were available to answer questions . He then told LT HI who then called Ms. D. The Board also considered the statement of the retired chief petty officer who stated that you were not derelict in your duties while you were treating him and that he did not see any disrespect.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05074-02
Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 3 June 2002, a copy of which is attached. 8 o MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06816-07
The administratively complete award recommendation package must consist of the following: (1) a Personal Award Recommendation (OPNAV 1650/3) (which includes the specific date(s) (day, month, and year) of Mr. Breidenbach's service) routed through his original chain of command for their review, comments, and recommendations; if all of the members of the chain of command are deceased, the recommending officer must include a signed statement indicating this fact, (2) a detailed summary of action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01798-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. If after thirty days subsequent to receipt of this letter you have not yet received a DD Form 215 correcting your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04417-00
On 6 February 1971 you reenlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve for six years. your years of qualifying service for reserve retirement. IN REPLY REFER TO 1821 MMSR-5 '14 Nov 96 Dear concerning record to the United that although 11 months are (IRR) United States Code, sections 12731 and 12732, require 365/366 day period in which a member earns a This is in response to your letter of 27 August 1996, your eligibility for Reserve Retired Pay.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08880-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 3 October 2002, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02400-07
02400-07 3 April 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary...