Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04196-02
Original file (04196-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

@OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 4 
17 December 2002

196-02

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

‘\

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

N130D1/02U0585  of 29 October 2002, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for’a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

  NAV Y

2000 NAVY PENTAGO

N
DC. 20350-200

WASHINGTON. 

0

IN REPLY REFER TO

542 0
N130D1/02u0585
29 

Ott 2002

MEMORANDUM FOR THE

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

COMMENT AND

Encl:

(1) BCNR case file  

#04196-02  with microfiche service record

The following provides

1.
Apprentice

comment and recommendation on Seaman
etition.

N130 recommends denial of on Seaman Apprentice

2.
petition for a waiver on recoupment of Enlistment Bonus

(EB).

3. Seaman Apprentice
the Delayed Entry Pr
for the GENDET Targe
an  EB contract-in the amount
Apprentice 
change her separation date in order to allow her to retain her
EB payment.

.e's enlisted in the Navy through
on 11 June 1999 and volunteered
ent Program Guarantee, and signed

idrequests  favorable action that would

of $2,000. In her petition, Seaman

:

OPNAV Instruction  

1160.6A provides details for

4.
administration of the Enlisted Bonus Program and states
"Continued entitlement to EB requires the member to maintain
qualification in the skill for the entire enlistment for which
the bonus was paid." Seaman Apprentice
separated from the Navy on 02 June 2000
her four-year enlistment.
period of
Apprentice
required.

She did not complete the obligated
In Seaman

'ch the bonus was paid.
case, pro-rata recoupment of the EB is

voluntarily

’

en one year into

BCNR  case file with microfiche service record is returned

5.
herewith as enclosure (1).

nlisted Bonus

Programs Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04972-02

    Original file (04972-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition; the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03281-01

    Original file (03281-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D.C. 20350-2000 N S IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1’ 6 Aug 01 01LJ1200 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subi: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #03281-01 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman 1. N130 recommends denial of Seaman Apprentice 2. for an Enlistment Bonus (EB). Challenge Program Guarantee petition, reclassification at RTC he was not offered an EB and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05426-02

    Original file (05426-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 5420~ N13 12 ODl/ Aug 2002 H~PLY RLFE~~ IO 02UO438 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION NAVAL RECORDS OF Subj: N THE CASE 0 Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05426-02 with microfiche service record llowing provides...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07245-02

    Original file (07245-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP : ddj Docket No: 26 November 2002 7245-02 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. h A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. In addition, the Board considered the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07147-02

    Original file (07147-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. N130 recommends denial of Seaman Apprentice 2. petition for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) College Ki of $3,000. He shipped to Recruit Training Command (RTC) on 1 e entered the Navy through the 29 March 2002, volunteered for the Seaman Apprentice...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05739-02

    Original file (05739-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/ 29 Ott 2002 02UO582 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF, I T Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05739-02 with microfiche service record 1. Every recruit is not offered nor The EB program is budgeted based Navy Recruiting Command and Seaman,mhas a valid EB Contract...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07383-02

    Original file (07383-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 20350-2000 54rQl@PLV REFER TO N130D1/02U0589 29 Ott 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NAVAL RECORDS BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF Subj : HE CASE 0 Encl: (1) BCNR case file #07383-02 with microfiche service...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00249-02

    Original file (00249-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04268-02

    Original file (04268-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. Seaman 2001. and signed an EB contract in the to Recruit Training Command (RTC) requests.favorable action that Kicker in addition to the EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the 4. discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to enlist in critical skills. Correction of Naval Records, Docket No.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07284-02

    Original file (07284-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N which is attached. An EB College Kicker is an EB and is governed Every recruit is not offered nor Navy Recruiting Command and the Seaman Apprentice Garcia has a valid EB Contract in the amount 5 .