DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2
NAVY
ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BIG
Docket No: 3551-02
20 December 2002
SN ,
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. You requested consideration
by a special selection board for the Fiscal Year 2002 Chief Petty Officer Selection Board.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 18 December 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the undated advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command, a copy
of which is attached.
.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W: DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF
N A V Y PERSONNEL
THE NAV Y
COMMA
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
ND
1430
Ser 811
15 02
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)
Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOXCB)
su
IN THE CAS
Ref (a) BUPERSINST 1401.2
Encl: (1) BCNR file
#0355 l-02
1. Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a), enclosure (1) is returned
recommending disapproval.
2. A review of our records indicates that Petty
170, January 2001 examination for advanceme
not obtain sufficient final multiple to be considered selection board eligible. A special
board can not be granted to a member who does not obtain eligibility for the regular
selection board.
articipate in the cycle
cer. However, he did
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09593-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01188-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 1 October 2002 118842 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United Stares Code, section 1552. Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on were reviewed in accordance...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07063-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. NAV Y NAVAL OPERATIONS 20350-2000 2000 NAVY PENTAGO N IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 02110583 29 Ott 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05754-02
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. NAV Y IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/02U0587 29 Ott 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: RECOMMENDATION SE OF PETTY OFFICER \ Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05754-02 with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04588-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ‘I JLP: ddj Docket No: 4588-02 8 October 2002 This is in reference provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. to.your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00877-02
’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Chief Petty enrolled Ms. (SBP) .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01576-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04272-06
Chief Petty Officer XXXX was selected to Senior Chief Petty Officer with an effective date of 16 December 1998.b. BCNR ltr LCC:ddj Docket No: 9653-02 of 1 April 2003, directed Chief retroactive advancement to Senior Chief Petty Officer be effective since there was no advisory indicating he was not in an eligible status to be advanced on that date. RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF HMCM Per reference (c), Chief XXXX new Time in Rate established his first eligibility for consideration to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04050-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Nuclear Field Program he was disqualified from the Petty Officer Reed requests favorable action that would allow payment of $4,000 EB . basic qualification for the EB, from required schools and who do not continue in the skill for Petty which enlisted, Officer did not complete the required...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02895-02
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. an Enlistment Bonus (EB).