DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
NAVY
ANNEX
2
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
Y
S
JRE
Docket No:
18 November 2002
3459-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
,three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
A
session, considered your application on 31 October 2002.
injustice were reviewed in
applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
accordan& with administrative regulations and procedures
Your allegations of error and
Documentary material considered by the Board
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 29 October 1955. On 10 August
1956 you were transferred from a drill pay status to the suspended list due to being
considered not physically qualified for active military service by reason of organic heart
disease. You were reassigned to the Standby Reserve on 27 December 1957, and discharged
from the Naval Reserve on 28 October 1961.
The Board rejected your unsubstantiated contention to the effect that your transfer from a drill
pay status was erroneous. As you were not unfit for duty because of a condition incurred
while you were entitled to basic Ray, and as you did not complete sufficient qualifying service
for retirement from the Naval Reserve, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective
action in your case. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05388-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Inactive) status when you were Sl (Standby-Reserve Active) status on 6 August 1996, as you had expressed no The Board found it would not have been appropriate for cognizant naval authorities to bring up the possibility of transferring you to S2 (Standby Reserve transferred to interest in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07390-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. However, at the end of your anniversary year, on 10 October 1968, you were only credited with 37 retirement points. Therefore, at the end of the 10 October 1970 anniversary year you were only credited with 19 retirement points.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08364-06
08364-0610 October 2006This is in reference to your recent letter, in which you requested, in effect, that the Board reconsider its decision of 30 March 2006, and find you fit for duty, or order you to undergo medical reevaluation with a view toward your restoration to the Navy Reserve in a drilling status so that you can complete the service necessary to qualify for Reserve Retirement.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, Considered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12093-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2010. As you have not demonstrated that you were unfit to reasonably perform the duties of your rank on 14 February 2003, when you were released from active duty, or on 15 August 2003, when you were voluntarily transferred to the IRR, your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10734-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06215-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Our letter, s not physically qualified and directed Naval not physically disk on 27 Jan 00, "inform member in writing of reference (d), stated Reference Subj: REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF b. In response to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08312-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01806-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 913 of 17 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13350-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 December 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. pcoonsequently, wher, applying for a correction of an official naval ‘record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the gexistence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02243-01
~ l l members of the Ready Reserve (including the Individual Ready Reserve) are required by law to be considered by promotion boards, whether or not they are actively participating. Per Title 10, U.S. Code, Chapter 1407, a lieutenant commander who has at least twice failed of selection and has completed 20 years of commissioned service must transfer to the Retired Reserve, if eligible, or be discharged. 0 was notified, per reference (c) , that he had become subject to the attrition...