DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
LCC:ddj
Docket No: 2799-O 1
14 May 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
provisions of title
10 of the United States Code, section
naval
1552.
Jecord pursuant to the
Board for
Kecords, sitting in executive session,
CoJrection of Naval
A three-member panel of the
considered your application on 14 May 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations
proceedings of this Board.
application, together with
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1070 MCRC (OA) of 13 March 2002, a copy of which
is attached.
Dociimentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
all material submitted in support thereof, your
procediixs applicable to the
and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
the advisory opinion.
the members of the panel will be furnished
Accordingly, your application has been
upon request.
denied. The names and votes of
-
in
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
In this regard, it is important
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
when applying
official
demonstrate the existence of probable material error
records. Consequently,
for a correction of an
IlaVa record, the burden is
011 the applicant to
or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
3280 RUSSELL ROA
D
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
22130-5103
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1070
MCRC (OA)
13 Mar 02
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION
OF NAVAL RECORDS
SU
Ref:
HE CASE 0
(a) MMER Route Sheet of 1 March 2002
(b) MP division ltr dated 1000 MPP-20 6 Mar 02
(c) MARADMIN
045/01
requested an advisory opinion in the case of
requesting correction to his Pay Entry Base
2. A review of
recommendation were germane:
a11 documentation submitted was made and the following facts and
a. Per reference (b), I totally a
Reference (c), does not apply to Captai
that were in the DEP and were erroneously credited time under it fall under this category.
ments made by MP division.
PLCs and
equest. Only those
OCCs
3.
It is our opinion that
POC two-
4.
3
DSN 278-9439.
ead Officer Appointments, Marine Corps Recruiting Command.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03925-04
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing therefrom the fitness reports for 1 January to 1 April 2002, 2 April to 22 June 2002, 23 June to31 December 2002, 1 January to 30 June 2003, and 1 July to26 August 2003. We do not, however, recommend that his voided MOS 8411 be reinstated and the recoupment of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00200-02
A three-member panel of tlie Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2002. In atltlirion, the Boartl consicleretl the advisory After careful and conscientious consi(leration of the entire record, tlie Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable ~naterial error or injustice. When he reenlisted back on ac:tive duty he was authorized the rank of Lance Corporal.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04613-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Marine Corps Recruiting Command, dated 24 June 2003, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00083-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the acceptance date (effective date for pay) of his original appointment as a limited duty officer (LDO) in the grade of captain from 4 December 2000 to 1 November 2000. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ensley, Pfeiffer and Taylor, reviewed Petitioner’s , and pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01263-01
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1 lb (“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) entry dated 23 February 2000. The Automated n Since your request to remove the Page 11 entry does not 3. fall under the purview of this Headquarters, your case will be forwarded to the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) for resolution 0 to that agency a lease direct further inquiries HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS DEPARTMENT OF THE 3280 RUSSELL...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05147-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to adjust his Career Retirement Credit Report (CRCR), Pay Entry Base Date (PEBD), date of rank as a captain, and Reserve retirement anniversary date to reflect service in the Air Force Reserve from 11 March 1999 to 25 October 2000. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06863-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative -of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Board. 11 May DSN: 278-0547. concerning at commercial this matter is w (703) 784-0547 or HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS DEPARTMENT OF THE 3280 RUSSELL ROA QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103 NAVY D IN REPLY REFER TO: 107...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05473-00
(6), the M arine Corps Recruiting Command ’s request to remove his page 11 entry should be MOS , and 2 In correspondence attached as enclosure (7), the HQMC Enlisted Assignment Branch (MI&A) has also commented to the effect that Petitioner ’s request to remove his page 11 entry should be approved, but his requests concerning his RFC should be denied. Point of contact is M ecommended that the Board equest for removal of the VMC 118(11), page 11 .entry dated Acting Head, Field Support...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08183-00
Your request to change your sergeant date of rank to 9 October 1998 was not considered, as the Marine Corps Total Force System already reflects that date. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, they sa 9 his date of rank is MCRC; that MCRC set his date of rank as 1 Jan 95; and that unless BCNR rules otherwise, MMPR-2...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08387-01
Petitioner denied that the applicant Petitioner was offered, and he accepted, NJP. Analysis a. Petitioner claims that his NJP was unjust because he believes the preliminary inquiry into his misconduct contained "inconsistencies" a statement Petitioner made at the NJP. The record of the NJP reveals that the NJP was just.