DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JRE
Docket No: 2099-02
10 September 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
*of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
A three-member panel
session, considered your application on 29 August 2002. Your allegations of error and
.with administrative regulations and procedures
injustice were reviewed in accordance
applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The evidence submitted in support of your application was considered insufficient to
demonstrate that you do not suffer from a seizure disorder.
noted that you did not advise your physician of significant aspects of your medical history.
That history, when considered together with the EEG changes noted while you were in the
Navy, as well as those noted by your private physician, indicates that you do suffer from a
seizure disorder. In addition, the Board noted that you were considered for administrative
separation before your seizure disorder was identified.
separated from the Navy by reason of unsatisfactory performance and/or a personality
disorder had you not been discharged because of the seizure disorder.
In either case, you
would have received a reenlistment code of RE-4. The available records indicate that you are
unsuitable for military service.
a condition incurred in or aggravated by your brief period of service.
There is no indication that you were unfit for duty because of
In this connection, the Board
It is clear that you would have been
In view of the foregoing,
members of the panel will
yo’ur application has been denied. The names and votes of the
bc furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04023-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2002. The military departments are permitted to rate only those conditions which render a service member unfit for duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02290-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2002. Unlike the VA, the military departments are permitted to assign disability ratings only in those cases where the service member has been found unfit for duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06771-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 June 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Although it is possible that you would have been prescribed vitamin B-6 had you disclosed your history of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01170-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive 1 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08316-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2009. On 16 May 1997, a medical board gave you diagnoses of incapacitating movements of the face, neck and eyes, obsessive compulsive disorder, and possible Tourette’e syndrome, and recommended that your case be referred to the Physical Evaluation Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02036-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence: of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04738-01
The Petitioner appears to have suffered clinically from a Schizoid Personality Disorder since childhood, Paranoid Schizophrenia approximately eight years after his administrative separation from the Navy via a Board of Medical Survey. was admitted to Navy station Hospital tarily had not talked or moved secondary to not wanting #3002. and that the best diagnosis for his difficulties at this time is that of bipolar disorder, mixed type.” Dr. Plattner also noted that the veteran is “severely...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04596-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2001. In this connection, the Board rejected your contentions to the effect that you suffered from post traumatic stress disorder at the time of your release from active duty in 1971, and that you were unfit by reason of physical disability at that time. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02027-01
Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the injustice. On 30 September 1986, you in connection with your pre-separation physical examination. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03165-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 June 2001. Although you were diagnosed a suffering from several mental disorder at that time, the only condition considered disabling was a psychotic disorder, not otherwise specified, which the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) determined existed prior to service (EPTS), and was not service aggravated. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...