DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
WMP
Docket No:
17 May 2002
2024-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session,
application on 15 May 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures' applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
of your application, together with all material submitted in
your naval record and applicable statutes,
support thereof,
regulations and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
Your allegations of error and
considered your
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 1 February
You served without incident until 19
for four years at age 24.
April 2000 when you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for a
period of unauthorized absence from 24 March to 4 April 2000.
Punishment imposed was forfeiture of $217, and 14 days
restriction and extra duty.
suspended.
The restriction and extra duty was
2000
On 9 May 2000 you were notified that separation action was being
initiated by reason of your failure to adapt to the naval
You were advised of and waived all of your
environment.
procedural rights, with the exception of the right to obtain
copies of documents that were being forwarded to the separation
authority supporting the basis for the proposed separation. On
10 May 2000 separation was approved and on 17 May 2000 you
received an entry level separation by reason of entry level
performance and conduct and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
to an individual separated by reason of entry level performance
and conduct.
The Board found evidence to indicate an inability
to adapt to the naval environment during recruit training.
after repeated counseling sessions and an NJP for unauthorized
absence, you failed to make the necessary adjustments.
The
Board concluded that the assigned reenlistment code was proper
and no change is warranted.
been denied.
will be furnished upon request.
The names and votes of the members of the panel
Accordingly, your application has
Even
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
it is important to keep in mind that
You are entitled to have
In this regard,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01476-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You On 24 January 2001 your commanding officer forwarded the separation action, to the discharge authority. supported the RE-4 reenlistment code due to your failure to adapt to the Marine Corps.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03130-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. At that time you were not recommended for reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07705-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable Statutes, regulations, and policies. At this time you were not recommended for retention or reenlistment, and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in the reenlistment code because of your failure to complete basic training due to your lack...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00920-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09022-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 November 2002. this’Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05397-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Based on the period of unauthorized absence, you were processed for an administrative discharge by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05310 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03535-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, the Board concluded that the other than honorable discharge was appropriate given your request for discharge in lieu of trial for two instances of assault, breach of the peace, wrongful use of marijuana, believed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00159-99
in your record. Regulations required the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged command due to substandard performance or by reason of inability to adapt to military service." The Board noted that you have applied for the Navy The Board also noted that the commanding and that your contention that You contend that you NJPs in only 16 months of service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02764-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 5 March 1982 you were RE-2 reenlistment code because of your honorable The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, immaturity and your contention that you should have received an RE-1 or discharge. Consequently, when applying for a...