DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 1998-02
12 September 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 September 2002.
Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 25
November 1991.
punishment on 7 October 1993 for drunk driving and driving on
base without a license.
second drunk driving incident.
1994, you received a second nonjudicial punishment for an
unauthorized absence of nine days.
On 15 May 1996 you were
honorably separated and transferred to the Marine Corps Reserve.
At that time, you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.
The Board concluded that your two nonjudicial punishments and the
two drunk driving incidents were more than sufficient to support
the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code.
concluded that there is no error or injustice in your
reenlistment code.
denied.
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that-the circumstances of your case are such that
The record reflects that you received nonjudicial
On 28 June 1994 you were counseled for a
Subsequently, on 21 November
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
Accordingly, your application has been
The Board thus
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01134-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07476-01
Punishment imposed consisted of a suspended On 25 April 1995 you were notified that administrative separation action was being initiated to discharge you under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and commission of a serious offense. present your case to an administrative discharge board You appeared before an ADB with counsel on 14 August 1995. The found you had committed misconduct due to ADB, by a vote of 3-0, a pattern of misconduct and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00471-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board believed that a record which includes two nonjudicial punishments, several counseling entries, and an alcohol related incident after...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07415-00
You are requesting reinstatement in the Marine Corps, promotion You to GYSGT and retirement with 20 years of active service. The Board was aware that in 1995 the Marine Corps was being very Further, selective concerning the reenlistment of the decision whether to allow reenlistment is a matter that falls within the discretion of the Commandant of the Marine Corps. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval 2 record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11042-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2008. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00079-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05803-01
stated: them" This tirade continued all the way to sickbay, You repeatedly you better get me off of here before I kill one of “Dot, You admitted On the same day, you underwent a psychiatric evaluation due to your angry outburst and threatening a master chief. Punishment consisted of a reduction in rate to BT3, On 18 February 1994 you were separated with a general discharge by reason of personality disorder and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. that board.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01541-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2009. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and the passage of time. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04744-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In February 1994 you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of convenience of the government due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4929 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-3C reentry code is authorized when a Marine is released from active duty, and is not recommended for reenlistment.