Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02781-01
Original file (02781-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

CRS
Docket No: 2781-01
19 July 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
Your allegations of error and
application on 18 July 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy o 28 September 2000
at age 18.
urinalysis that tested positive for marijuana.
2000 the commanding officer directed your separation.
Subsequently, on 7 November 2000 you received an entry level
separation by reason of erroneous enlistment due to drug abuse.
At that time you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.
The Board noted that applicable regulations require the
assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are
separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of
drugs.
injustice in your reenlistment code.
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material

The Board thus concluded that there is no error or

On 29 September 2000 you submitted to an accession

On 2 November

Accordingly, your

The names and votes of the members

You are entitled to have the

evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00069-01

    Original file (00069-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2001. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3J reenlistment code when an individual in an entry level status tests positive for marijuana use, served less than 30 days in the DEP, confessed to the use of marijuana during the moment of truth, and was processed for separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04688-01

    Original file (04688-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Prior to separation, you acknowledged On 8 November 2000, the separation You were so separated Since you have been treated no differently than Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05792-01

    Original file (05792-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. separated under similar circumstances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06262-01

    Original file (06262-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 September 2001. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of drugs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03972-01

    Original file (03972-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of drugs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07456-01

    Original file (07456-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of drugs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04957-01

    Original file (04957-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support and applicable statutes, regulations, thereof, your naval record, and policies. You waived the right to respond to the On 6 June 2001 you were separated from the Navy with an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of defective enlistment and induction/erroneous enlistment due to drug abuse, and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. The Board concluded...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04441-01

    Original file (04441-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 12 January 2001 Subsequently, At the time The Board thus concluded that there is no error or The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of drugs. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08669-00

    Original file (08669-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of drugs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01565-01

    Original file (01565-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...