DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
TJR
Docket No: 8190-01
24 May 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code,
Section 1552.
sitting in executive session, considered your
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records,
application on 20 May 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application,
thereof, your naval record,
and policies.
together with all material submitted in support
and applicable statutes, regulations,
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record,
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
You enlisted in the Navy on 30 September 1974 at the age of 17.
Your record reflects that on 9 April 1975 you received
nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for failure to obey a lawful order
and were awarded a $50 forfeiture of pay and reduction to
paygrade E-l.
On 17 February 1976 you received NJP for an 89 day period of
unauthorized absence (UA) and failure to obey a lawful order.
The punishment imposed was restriction and extra duty for 30
days, a $300 forfeiture of pay,
On 19 February 1976 you were notified of pending administrative
separation action by reason of unsuitability due to apathy and a
After consulting with legal counsel, you
defective attitude.
submitted a written statement in which you stated that you wanted
to be discharged.
a general discharge by reason of unsuitability, and on 23
February 1976, you were so discharged.
and reduction to
Subsequently,
the discharge authority directed
paygrade E-l.
Character of service is based, in part, on conduct and overall
trait averages which are computed from marks assigned during
periodic evaluations.
of 3.0 in conduct was required at the time of your separation for
a fully honorable characterization of service.
Your conduct average was 2.74.
An average
in its review of your entire record and application,
The Board,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and immaturity and post service conduct.
Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a
change in the characterization of your service because of your
misconduct,
conduct average was insufficiently high to warrant a fully
honorable characterization of service.
application has been denied.
which included a lengthy period of UA, and since your
Accordingly, your
However, the
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard,
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently,
record,
existence of probable material error or injustice.
the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
when applying for a correction of an official naval
it is important to keep in mind that a
You are entitled to have the
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01967-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. totalling $396,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07199-98
A three-member panel of the Board.for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The punishment imposed was restriction for 30 On 23 November 1977 you received NJP paygrade E-3 and Your record further reflects that during the period from...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03949-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. (NJP) for The During the period from 15 March to 12 July 1966 you received NJP on three more occasions for failure to go to your appointed place of duty, absence from your appointed place of duty, two specifications of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08479-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. circumstances in your case the Board concluded your discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06514-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your general discharge because of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08780-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10392-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. An average of 3.0 in conduct was required at the time of your separation for a fully honorable characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is existence of probable on the applicant to demonstrate the material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00775-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your conduct average was 3.6. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06337-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07844-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Board. Your conduct average was 3.8. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.