Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00978-01
Original file (00978-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

1

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 978-01
27 March 2001

t

This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased former spouse’s naval
record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your former spouse’s naval
record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum of 6 March 2001, a copy of which is
attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
NAVY  PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 380550000

Y

,

6 Mar 01

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

Via:

Subj:

Ref:

(a) BCNR memo of 9 Feb 01

Per reference

(a,), recommend the BCNR not correct

1.
Petty Officer
changed his election under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) from
spouse to former spouse coverage
divorce.

record to reflect that he voluntarily

category within one year of his

2 .

The recommendation is based on the following:

a.

Petty Officer

30 June 1976.
coverage on   30 June 1976.

He enrolled in  

ransferred to the Fleet Reserve on

SBP spouse and child category

b.

on 17 April 1990.

Petty Officer.
Pe

ere divorced
st 2000.

C .

Title 10, U.S . Code, Section 1448(b)(3), requires that SBP

spouse coverage who become divorced and desire
former spouses as their beneficiaries must

participants with
to maintain their
specifically elect such coverage within one year after the date of
divorce.
and Accounting Service-Cleveland (DFAS-CL) will automatically
terminate coverage upon receiving information regarding their
divorce.

If nothing is done after one year, the Defense Finance

3 .
MS'
in the
provide SBP coverage for her as his former spouse.

has not provided s
e decree) that PO1

ent evidence (i.e. provisions
was specifically required to

Brsnch (PERS-622)

Activities



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02812-01

    Original file (02812-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 7 September 2001, a copy of which is attached. Senior Chief Petty Officer voluntarily changed his election under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) from spouse to former spouse...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05755-01

    Original file (05755-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 1 October 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1448(b)(3), requires that SBP spouse coverage who become divorced and desire former spouses as their beneficiaries must participants with to maintain their specifically elect such coverage...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08438-01

    Original file (08438-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    When you were divorced in November 1999 the court ordered you to furnish your former spouse with SBP coverage. In response to reference (a), recommend the BCNR not correct Petty Officer -record changed his election under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) from spouse to former spouse coverage category within one year of his divorce. Additionally, a member who refuses coverage for an eligible spouse in favor of children only category is prohibited from electing spouse coverage at a later date...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08722-00

    Original file (08722-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, Petty Officer Grau ’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum of 23 February 2001, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08054-02

    Original file (08054-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and session, considered injustice were reviewed to the proceedings of this your application, together naval record and the advisory opinion fumis attached. Chief Petty Officer voluntarily change (SBP) from spouse t year of his divorce of 27 Sep 02 ference (a), P recommend the BCNR not correct record to reflect that he former ction under the Survivor Benefit Plan spouse category coverage within one 2. I year period, the De (DFAS -CL ) will auto deductions...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08847-07

    Original file (08847-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) has no record of receiving your letter dated 16 February 1990 or any other request to elect or deem former spouse coverage within one year of your divorce. His SBP spouse category premiums were suspended effective 7 March 1989. c. Per reference (b), if a member was required to elect former spouse coverage by a court order, incident to a proceeding of divorce, dissolution, or annulment, the member may elect to change to former spouse category...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03954-01

    Original file (03954-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. (SBP) Termination Request.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07794-02

    Original file (07794-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your former spouse naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ’s In addition, the Board considered After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. letter from DFAS-CL dated 14 June 1999 which...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09737-06

    Original file (09737-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    9737-06 14 March 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2007. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. In response to reference...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08056-01

    Original file (08056-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Additionally, quarterly newsletter) PERS-62 and local Retired Activities Offices been available to provide information regarding SBP...