DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 957-00
5 April 2001
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 3 April 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 23 May 1996 at
age 19.
Truth" during recruit
training, you revealed that you had used marijuana, cocaine, and
other drugs prior to enlistment.
On 25 May 1996 you were found
to be dependent on marijuana thus voiding your enlistment.
June 1996 you received a void enlistment by reason of misconduct
due to drug abuse, at which time you were assigned a reenlistment
code of RE-4.
On 24 May 1996, at the "Moment of
On 7
In this regard, the Board noted your contention that
Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4
reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to
misconduct.
you lied about the drugs in order to get out of the Navy.
However, the Board could not determine if you were lying then or
lying now.
others in your situation,
injustice in the assignment of your reenlistment code.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Since you have been treated no differently than
the Board could not find an error or
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04916-01
A psychiatric evaluation in the record states that you were referred by the chaplain for depression, frequent crying, inability to adapt to military life, anger, anxiety, and problems with your family and girlfriend. facts alleged at the time including the alcohol abuse, breaking mirrors, and general unhappiness were fictional and designed to create a picture of distress. He appears have an understanding of the reality Clinical evidence However, pre- The Board noted that the diagnosed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07008-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. on the urinalysis you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of erroneous enlistment due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02685-01
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. no differently than others discharged under similar circum- stances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03348-01
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 11 December 1996 you submitted to an accession The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 10 December 1996 at age 22. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04703-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Subsequently, on 18 April 1996 you At the time you were assigned a On 12 April 1996 the commanding officer On 3 The Board thus concluded that there is no error or The Board noted that applicable regulations require...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03437-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The psychiatrist anti- On 24 September 1996 you were notified of separation processing by reason of personality disorder, fraudulent enlistment, erroneous enlistment and alcohol rehabilitation failure. that you would be an outstanding member of the military and recommended that your record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05872-01
The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy on 5 November 1993 for three years as a PNSN (E-3). At the time of your separation, E-4 was 10 years. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00069-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2001. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3J reenlistment code when an individual in an entry level status tests positive for marijuana use, served less than 30 days in the DEP, confessed to the use of marijuana during the moment of truth, and was processed for separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03832-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Based on the dependency diagnosis, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of a void enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07021-00
on 14 December 1999. and admitted to using alcohol 650 times and marijuana 1900 times. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is separated from Navy recruit training due to In addition such a code is assigned when an drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.