Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00714-01
Original file (00714-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

CRS
Docket No: 714-01
13 April 2001

From:
To:
Subj:

Ref:
Encl:

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF

(a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject's naval record

filed enclosure (1) with this

that his naval record be corrected
Additionally, he requests that

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Navy,
Board requesting, in effect,
to show a more favorable type of discharge than the general
discharge issued on 22 May 1999.
item 15a on his Report of Separation (DD Form 214) be corrected
to show that he contributed to the Veterans' Educational
Assistance Program (VEAP).
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, 
Mackey, and
Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 11 April 2001 and,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
Documentary material
taken on the available evidence of record.
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all'the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

pursuant to its regulations,

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.
c. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 23 May 1995 at age 20.

At that time he enrolled in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB).

d. The record reflects that Petitioner received two

The offenses included an unspecified
nonjudicial punishments.
violation of Article 86 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice
and use of a controlled substance.

On 22 May 1999 Petitioner

received a general discharge by reason of expiration of term of
service.

e. In accordance with Defense Department policy, character of

service is based on one's individual overall traits average,
which are computed from marks assigned during periodic
Taking all of his marks into account, Petitioner's
evaluations.
individual overall trait average was 3.0.
required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the
time of Petitioner's separation was 2.0 in individual overall
trait average.

A minimum average mark

f. Petitioner states that he enrolled in the MGIB. Block 15a
llnotl.

on the DD Form 214 pertains to VEAP and should be checked 
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants partial
In this regard, the Board concludes that his general
relief.
discharge should be recharacterized to honorable based on his
individual overall trait average.
Although Petitioner has requested that block 15a on his DD Form
"yes", it is obvious that he was not enrolled
214 be changed to 
Therefore, the Board
in VEAP and the block should remain 
concludes that this request should be denied.
In view of the foregoing,
injustice warranting the following corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:

the Board finds the existence of an

"no".

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he
was issued an honorable discharge by reason of expiration  of term
of service on 22 May 1999 vice the general discharge  actually
issued on that date.

b. That no further relief be granted.
C . That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in

Petitioner's naval record.

d. That, upon request, the Veterans Administration be informed

that Petitioner's application was received by the Board on 29
January 2001.

2

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
and that the foregoing is a true and
review and deliberations,
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

gg

/

.

Acting Recorder

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
has been approved by the Board on
authority of reference (a),
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Executive



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010167

    Original file (20140010167.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "Yes" in item 15a indicating he contributed to the Post-Vietnam Era Veterans' Educational Assistance Program (VEAP). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The VEAP and MGIB are two separate educational programs.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015764

    Original file (20100015764.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    b. Paragraph 2-4 (Completing the DD Form 214) contains item-by-item instructions for completing the DD Form 214. The applicant contends that item 15a of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he contributed to the Veteran's Educational Assistance Act (New GI Bill) so that he will not be denied educational benefits. The evidence of record shows the applicant's DD Form 214, item 15a, is properly marked "No."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010542

    Original file (20100010542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veteran's Education Assistance Program (VEAP)) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 2 March 2005 to show "Yes" instead of "No" which will allow him to use his Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB). He was issued a DD Form 214 that shows the "No" block is marked in item 15a. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017509

    Original file (20060017509.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a DD Form 214, with an effective date of 31 December 2003, that shows he was honorably retired from active duty after completing a total of 20 years and 19 days active service. The evidence of record shows that the applicant enrolled in the “New GI Bill” (i.e., the MGIB) on 3 March 1997. The DD Form 214 in use at the time of the applicant’s retirement from active duty is not designed to show an individual’s contribution to the MGIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004430

    Original file (20090004430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veteran's Educational Assistance Program (VEAP)) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "Yes" instead of "No." The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 14 April 2003, in support of his request. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he contributed to the VEAP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004981

    Original file (20070004981.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not show that he contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veterans’ Educational Assistance Program. The DD Form 214 in use at the time of the applicant’s discharge from active duty is not designed to show an individual’s contribution to the MGIB. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s DD Form 214, Item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veteran’s Educational Assistance Program) is properly marked “No.” Therefore, considering all the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007428

    Original file (20100007428.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the “Yes” block in Item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veteran’s Educations Assistance Program (VEAP)) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 October 2002 be checked instead of the “No” block which will allow him to use his Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB). He was issued a DD Form 214 that shows the “Yes” block is marked in Item 15a. He was issued a DD Form 214 that shows the “No”...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07003-05

    Original file (07003-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013508

    Original file (20080013508.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show that he contributed to the Post-Vietnam Era Veteran's Educational Assistance Program (VEAP). The applicant contends that he contributed to the Post-Vietnam Era VEAP and that his DD Forms 214 should show his contributions.

  • CG | BCMR | Education Benefits | 2011-243

    Original file (2011-243.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On October 20, 2011, the Judge Advocate General (JAG) of the Coast Guard submitted an advisory opinion recommending that the Board deny relief in accordance with a memorandum submitted by the Commander, Personnel Service Center (PSC). Block 18 of the DD 214 correctly includes the following comment with regard to MGIB:...