Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013508
Original file (20080013508.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       12 March 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080013508 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show that he contributed to the Post-Vietnam Era Veteran's Educational Assistance Program (VEAP).

2.  The applicant states that he contributed $100.00 per month for 12 months to the VEAP. 

3.  The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of his DD Forms 214 and his Leave and Earnings Statements (LES's) from December 2000 through December 2001. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 28 October 2000, the applicant enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) for a period of 8 years under the Delayed Entry Program (DEP).

3.  Evidence of record shows a DD Form 2366 (Montgomery GI Bill Act of 1984 (MGIB)), dated 28 October 2000, was completed by the applicant for enrollment in the MGIB.

4.  On 13 November 2000, the applicant was discharged from the DEP and enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 November 2000 for a period of 4 years.  He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 91W (Health Care Specialist).

5.  The applicant's LES's show that $100.00 per month was deducted from his military pay each month from December 2000 through November 2001 for the MGIB.

6.  On 13 November 2004, the applicant was released from active duty by reason of completion of required active service and transferred to the 312th Field Hospital, USAR.  He had attained the rank of specialist (SPC)/pay grade E-4, and had completed 4 years of creditable active duty service.

7.  Item 15a of his DD Form 214, ending on 13 November 2004, indicates that he did not contribute to the Post-Vietnam Era VEAP.

8.  On 9 May 2007, the applicant was ordered to active duty with his Reserve unit in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.  He served in Iraq from 6 August 2007 to 3 May 2008, and was released from active duty on 14 June 2008.

9.  Item 15a of his DD Form 214, ending on 14 June 2008, indicates that he did not contribute to the Post-Vietnam Era VEAP.  

10.  The Post-Vietnam Era VEAP (Chapter 32 of Title 38, U. S. Code) and the Educational Assistance Pilot Program (Section 903 of Public Law 96-342) were enacted by Congress to attract high quality men and women to the all-voluntary Armed Forces.  The VEAP was available for those Soldiers who elected to make contributions from their military pay to participate in this education benefit program.  The contributions were matched on a $2 for $1 basis by the Government.  To qualify, the Soldier must have met the following requirements:

   a.  entered service for the first time between 1 January  1977, and 30 June 1985; 

   
   b.  opened a contribution account before 1 April 1987; 

   c.  voluntarily contributed from $25 to $2700; 

   d.  completed their first period of service; and 

e.  were discharged or released from service under conditions other than dishonorable. 

11.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) provides detailed instructions for completing separation documents, including the DD Form 214.  It provides, in pertinent part, that Item 15a, Post-Vietnam Era Veteran's Educational Assistance Program (VEAP), for any Soldier who enlisted after 1985, is to be marked "No."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he contributed to the Post-Vietnam Era VEAP and that his DD Forms 214 should show his contributions.

2.  The available evidence shows that the applicant was not eligible for enrollment in the Post-Vietnam Era VEAP.  Furthermore, both of his DD Forms 214 are correctly marked "No" in Item 15a, indicating that he did not contribute to this educational program.

3.  The available evidence clearly shows that the applicant did enroll in the MGIB under the provisions of the 1984 MGIB Act and made twelve monthly contributions to this educational program.  This enrollment was in an educational program established subsequent to the Post-Vietnam Era VEAP.  There is no requirement or authority to identify this information on the DD Form 214.

4.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X ___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ________X______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013508



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013508



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070019003

    Original file (20070019003.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 April 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070019003 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veteran's Educational Assistance Program) (VEAP) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020469

    Original file (20090020469.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records contain a DD Form 2366 showing he enrolled in the MGIB on 18 September 2000. Although the applicant's record does not contain documentation showing he served in Afghanistan, the Service Member Deployment History Outprocessing Verification provided by counsel shows the applicant was present for duty for 130 days in Kandahar, Afghanistan during the period 2 February 2002 to 12 June 2002. The evidence of record shows the applicant enrolled in the MGIB on 18...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004981

    Original file (20070004981.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not show that he contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veterans’ Educational Assistance Program. The DD Form 214 in use at the time of the applicant’s discharge from active duty is not designed to show an individual’s contribution to the MGIB. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s DD Form 214, Item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veteran’s Educational Assistance Program) is properly marked “No.” Therefore, considering all the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015494

    Original file (20110015494.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 January 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110015494 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) at item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP)) be changed from no to yes. VEAP is for those who first entered active duty during the period 1 January 1977 through 30 June 1985, and who made a contribution to a VEAP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017509

    Original file (20060017509.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a DD Form 214, with an effective date of 31 December 2003, that shows he was honorably retired from active duty after completing a total of 20 years and 19 days active service. The evidence of record shows that the applicant enrolled in the “New GI Bill” (i.e., the MGIB) on 3 March 1997. The DD Form 214 in use at the time of the applicant’s retirement from active duty is not designed to show an individual’s contribution to the MGIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015764

    Original file (20100015764.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    b. Paragraph 2-4 (Completing the DD Form 214) contains item-by-item instructions for completing the DD Form 214. The applicant contends that item 15a of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he contributed to the Veteran's Educational Assistance Act (New GI Bill) so that he will not be denied educational benefits. The evidence of record shows the applicant's DD Form 214, item 15a, is properly marked "No."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010483C070208

    Original file (20040010483C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Jeanette R. McCants | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Veteran's Educational Assistance Program-VEAP) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect "Yes" instead of "No." By regulation, Item 15a of the separation document should be marked "No" for any Soldier who enlisted in the Army after the year 1985.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510983C070209

    Original file (9510983C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to show that he contributed to the post-Vietnam Era Veterans’ Educational Assistance Program (VEAP), and that he be made eligible for VEAP benefits by crediting him with 30 months of active duty if his separation is considered for the convenience of the Government, or 36 months if it is not considered for the convenience of the Government. Actually, by the time he entered active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010167

    Original file (20140010167.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "Yes" in item 15a indicating he contributed to the Post-Vietnam Era Veterans' Educational Assistance Program (VEAP). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The VEAP and MGIB are two separate educational programs.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016737

    Original file (20090016737.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Paragraph 2-4 (Completing the DD Form 214) of the separation documents regulation, contains item-by-item instructions for completing the DD Form 214. However, the DD Form 214 in use at the time of the applicant’s separation from active duty is not designed to show an individual’s contribution to the MGIB.