DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
ANNEX
NAVY
2
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
S
WMP
Docket No:
11 July 2002
0642-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 10 July 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures'applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Marine Corps at age 17 on 29 December 1961
Your record reflects that you served without
for four years.
incident until 17 December 1962,
punishment (NJP) for failure to be at your appointed place of
duty.
The punishment imposed was seven days of extra duty.
when you received non-judicial
Your record further reflects that on 1 April 1963 you were
convicted in civil court of failure to appear after signing a
citation, and were fined $5.25 and served one day in jail.
On 28 May 1963 you received NJP for failure to be at your
appointed place of duty.
restriction.
failure to be at your appointed place of duty and received seven
On 15 May 1964 you received NJP
days of correctional custody.
You again received NJP on 26 June 1963 for your
The punishment imposed was'14 days of
for failure to obey a lawful order.
a forfeiture of $33 and 14 days of restriction.
The punishment imposed was
Your record that you were an unauthorized absentee between 23
March 1965 and 1 April 1965, however, the record does not
reflect that any action was taken for this period of
unauthorized absence.
On 28 May 1965, you were convicted by special court-martial of
an unauthorized absence from 3 to 28 April 1965.
imposed was confinement at hard labor for three months, a
forfeiture of $70 per month for three months, and a reduction in
On 2 July 1965, the convening
rank to private (PVT) (E-l).
authority approved a reduced sentence of confinement at hard
labor of one month, a forfeiture of $70 per month for one month,
The convening authority suspended
and reduction in rank to PVT.
the remainder of the punishment imposed for a six month period
from the completion of the confinement.
The punishment
On 2 August 1966, you were released from active duty under
honorable conditions and transferred to the Marine Corps
Reserve.
obligation, you received a general discharge.
.upon completion of your military
On 2 April 1968,
Characterization of service is based, in part, on conduct and
proficiency averages computed from periodically assigned marks.
Your conduct average was 3.7.
conduct average of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable
characterization of service.
At the end of your service, a
NJP's, and conviction by
The Board concluded that your four
special court-martial for an extended period of unauthorized
absence clearly provided sufficient justification to warrant a
your discharge under honorable conditions.
your failure to attain the required average mark in conduct.
The Board thus concluded that your discharge was proper and no
Accordingly, your application has been
change is warranted.
denied.
furnished upon request.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
The Board also noted
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
You are entitled to have
2
In this regard,
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
it is important to keep in mind that
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11044-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 18 Nay 1960 at age 18. You were sentenced to confinement at hard...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08189-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 June 2001.. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable Board. to go to your appointed special court-martial (SPCM) of failure place of duty and were sentenced to hard labor for a month and a $60 forfeiture of pay. paygrade E-l and restriction for 15 convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of disobedience and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07927-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 3 April 1961 at age 17. On 10 February 1965 an ADB recommended an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01492-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 14 September 1963 for four years at age 17. However, the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10669-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. April 1961, you were convicted by a SCM of being UA for one day.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02150-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02008-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 13 April 1962 you were convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of absence from your appointed place of duty and sentenced to hard labor for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03354-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. these factors...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07446-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06342-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 1 November 1960 you received NJP for On 30 January 1961 you were convicted by convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of absence from your appointed place of duty and were sentenced to restriction and extra duty for 10 days and a $40 forfeiture of pay. Consequently, when applying for a...