DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
HD: hd
Docket No: 00077-01
6 April 2001
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:
Secretary of the Navy
Subj:
LTJ
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a)
Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl:
(1)
(2)
(3)
DD Form 149 dtd 4 Jan 00 (sic) w/attachments
PERS-85 memo dtd 2 Mar 01
Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure
(1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show 19 vice
20 December 1998 in blocks 14 (permanent grade date) and 16 (present grade date) of his
Officer Appointment Acceptance and Oath of Office (NAVCRUIT
commission as an ensign in the Naval Reseve. These blocks reflect his ensign date of rank.
1000/20) for his
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Shy and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s
allegations of error and injustice on 5 April 2001, and pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations
of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies
available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.
In correspondence attached as enclosure
(NPC)
office with cognizance over the subject matter of this case has commented to the effect that
Petitioner’s request to change his ensign date of rank to 19 December 1998 has merit and
warrants favorable action.
(2), the Navy Personnel Command
C.
Petitioner has been promoted to lieutenant junior grade with a date of rank and
effective date of 20 December 2000. Had his ensign date of rank been established as
19 December 1998, the date of rank and effective date of his promotion would have been
19 December 2000.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the
contents of enclosure (2) and their findings at paragraph 3.c above, the Board finds the
existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected to show 19 December 1998 vice
20 December 1998 in blocks 14 (permanent grade date) and 16 (present grade date) of his
Officer Appointment Acceptance and Oath of Office (NAVCRUIT
commission as an ensign in the Naval Reserve, thereby establishing his ensign date of rank
as 19 December 1998 vice 20 December 1998.
10/20) for his
b. That his record be corrected further to show the date of rank and effective date of
2ooO vice 20 December 2000; and
his promotion to lieutenant junior grade as 19 December
that his lineal precedence be adjusted accordingly.
C. That any material or entries inconsistent with the Board
corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner
or material be added to the record in the future.
’s recommendation be
’s record and that no such entries
d. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed at an appropriate location in
Petitioner ’s naval record, and that another copy of this report be returned to this Board,
together with any material directed to be removed from Petitioner
confidential tile maintained for such purpose.
in a
’s record, for retention
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
&/
/G&&G&
<@_b
JONATHAN S.
Acting Recorder
RUSKIN
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
2
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
DEPARTMENT OF
TH& NAVY
BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
MEMORANDUM FOR BCNR
Via:
BUPERS/BCNR Coordinator
Subj:
Ref:
(a) DD Form 214 ICO LT
5420
Pers 85
02 Mar 01
18
Dee 98
ante and Oath of Office
of 19
Dee 98
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
1.
Enclosure (1) is returned recommending approval of LTJG
CNR request.
2.
Per ref (a),
Per ref (b), the
and Oath of Office on 19
blocks 14 and 16 of ref (b) show a date of 20
error in date of rank as an Ensign and a break in service.
igned DD Form 214 on 18
d an Officer Appointment Acceptance
An administrative error in
Dee 98, causing an
Dee 98.
Dee 98.
3.
19
Recommend
Dee 98.
Ensign date of rank be corrected to
BCNR Liaison,
And Enlisted Advancements Division
Officer Promotions
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08250-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his date of rank in the grade of lieutenant as 19 August 1976 vice 20 May 1972. Counsel insisted that Petitioner’s lieutenant date of rank should be corrected as requested, to allow him to complete 30 years of service in fiscal year 2007. Accordingly, counsel requested, ’ in the event...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04063-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she was commissioned on 19 December 1998, rather than 24 March 1999. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ensley, Schultz and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 August 2000, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06385-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to reflect entry grade credit for her dietetic internship. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show the date of rank on her commission as an ensign, Medical Service Corps, U. S. Naval Reserve as 7 April 1999, vice 7 January 2000; and that her lineal precedence be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06129-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 HD: hd Docket No: 06129-00 20 July 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: LCDR REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD c, us Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07857-02
1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 dtd 27 Aug 02 PERS-80 memo dtd 5 Sep 02 Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by changing his ensign date of rank to 22 August 1998, his lieutenant junior grade date of rank and effective date to 22 August 2000, and his lieutenant date of rank and effective date to 1...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06261-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE: NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 2037C-5100 HD: hd Docket No: 06261-00 4 June 2001 C USNR Dear Lieuten This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, your lieutenant date of rank be changed from 20 May 1 March 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2000-030
The Chief Counsel also argued that the applicant has not presented evi- dence that “overcome[s] the presumption that Coast Guard officials carried out their duties correctly, lawfully, and in good faith,” nor shown that the Coast Guard committed any “error or injustice entitling him to the requested relief.” He stated that any determination by the Board that the Coast Guard was required to accept one of the applicant’s offers (inter-service transfer) over the other (direct commission through...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06179-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the date of rank on his original appointment as an ensign, Nurse Corps, United States Naval Reserve from 2 September 2004 to 7 July 2004. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Caron, Lippolis and Mann, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 October 2005, and pursuant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05890-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s rank prior to commissioning was as an E-7 vice E-6. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 August 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00381-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Petitioner's EAOS at the time was 11 Jul 99. petitioner reenlisted there were no SRB entitlements for the DK(0000) rating per reference (b). This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.