Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08587-00
Original file (08587-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved 
2

4

I’.

-,

(,,,.,__ _,.,

..,~ 

.,-,.,---

.,...-,.
 

~-~-

From:

 
Comnanding

Offim
 

.-,.

,,,,
 

*

__._~_“,_~__
,_

.-

-__

---

‘1

,

 -.., 

-,,,, .xxx-

~&, “.,-_-

__........_.
 

“i.l,“.~..____
 

i____.~,_,^l-..._
 

.,,,,,.__ 
 

-,.,,.,.,.,.,.
__”

,,,,,.,,.,.,., _.~_ 
 
_~,,,,.,.,., __ 
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,“_.._
,..._,,,,,,,,_~_

,,,,,,,, 

,..._.__,_

-_-~...x~,.

TsaJliarnE

,,.“_ 
 
/

-._._...,

,.

,_ 

_.___

_,,,-.---_-.Lxl

.,~,,.

-._-.

~,_,_,.

I,,,,,,

;.-,a-“-
I1E:VfxOP

_______

 

,“,“,“““““““““““,_“““,“,__
,,,,,.,^,
-,II,^* 

,,,_ 

,-
,,~.,-...-.--..

,,,,, “l^ll-

..^, ~~. ” 
 
 ,,,, _“,_._ 
^,,,,, ____I
,,,, 
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

_ l-_-.-,----,

 ~I,~ 

1,1~

~.---~.-,l,--,

.l_.~.--..__~

--,-____._

ed

a

.,,j 

**

?

-.., 

.xXx- 

-,,,, 

~&, “.,-_-  

__........_.  

“i.l,“.~..____  

i____.~,_,^l-..._  

__ 

.,,,,,.

,...

-_-~...x~,.

,,,,,,,, 

,,,,.,.,., 
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

_~
_.__,_

-,.,,.,.,.,.,.  
__”

_.~_  
_~_

,,,,,.,,.,.,.,  
,..._,,,,,,,,

__  
“_.._

TsaJliarnE

,,.“_ 
/

-._._...,  

_,,,-.---_-.Lxl

,.

,_  

_.___

.,~,,.

-

a-“

-._-.
~,_,_,.;.-,
I1E:VfxOP

 

I,,,,,,

_______

,_“““,“,__

,“,“,“““““““““““
,,,,,.,^,
 

,,,_ 

-,I_,^*

,-
,,~.,-...-.--..

..^, 
~~. ” 
,,,,, 
“l^ll- 
,,,, 
_“,_._ 
^,,,,, 
____I 
,,,, 

~I,~  

_ l-_-.-,----,

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 

1,1~

~.---~.-,l,--,
.l_.~.--..__~

--,-____._

ed

a

.,,j 

**

?

..^, 
~~.” 
,,,,, 
“l^ll- 
,,,, 
_“,_._ 
^,,,,, 
____I 
,,,, 

~I,~ 

_l-_-.-,----,

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 

1,1~

~.---~.-,l,--,
.l_.~.--..__~

--,-____._

ed

a

.,,j 

**

?

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00374-02

    Original file (00374-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Petitioner, record be RECOMMENDATION : That Petitioner 25 January ’s II:I\,;II record 1~ 12. I~>ly~rild~ 200 I is in correctctl, Docket No: 374-02 \\#IIcI-c’ ;~l)pr”pri;\te~ to show that the enlistment of P\lrsuant to Section 6(c) 4. ;iiid I’etlcr;~l I-e\,iu\ l~roctmlin~s in I’ro~c‘durt’s Sc’c’tion ot‘ the 13.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03636-02

    Original file (03636-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 I . (:(1:yI.,i lhcket No: IO July 200 I 36X-02 5: tll),i : Rr:\‘lr5\\ 01. li)rc~goiil~ is ;i true and complet e ROJ3ERT Recorder II.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02215-02

    Original file (02215-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    that tlie applicable naval record be corrected to estahlisli entitlelntvt to a /onc " A " Sclcclivc Kc~enlistnient Ronus (SKH) for the M A rating. )ocu~iie~itiiry ~iiateriill consitl~,~-etl records. The Board, 11;lving reviewctl all tlic l'acts ot' rcco~-tl pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and ili~jirstice.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00684

    Original file (FD-2014-00684.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthe discharge

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00754

    Original file (FD-2014-00754.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleading tothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: The applicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor MisconductThe...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2012-00415

    Original file (FD-2012-00415.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon the availableservice record. The attachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothe discharge.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02281-02

    Original file (02281-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Sihj : REVIEW OF NAVAI, 1~1~(:01:1> Ret-: (a) ‘I’itl? The Board, Petitioner ’s allegations regulations, available evidence of enclosures, naval ~1 ot‘ consistin, 01‘ error that rem+. 3. of error The Board, and h;\ving iII.juslice, reviewed all finds the follo~5: as t;lcth 01‘ I-ccortl pcrt;lining to Petitioner ’s allegation s a.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04989-02

    Original file (04989-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You contend in your application that you were not released from active duty on 6 April 1964 but continued to serve until May 1964. request and have not stated why you want such a correction. 214, and entries on three other service record pages also show that you were released from active duty on that date. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00594

    Original file (FD-2014-00594.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetoHonorable. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge A discharge isupgradedonly ifthe applicantandtheBoardcanestablishthatan inequityorimproprietytookplaceatthe time of discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00423

    Original file (FD2004-00423.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    YES No PERSONAL APPEARANCE , ,] N,\ML OF COUNSEI.AND ORORGANIZATION RECORD REVIEW X ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL I I - INDEX NUMBER A67.50 -. u ; \ ll \\ . Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.